Presently, there exists a large number of historic houses that have had their walls
insulated with loose-fill cellulose and can now be studied 10, 20 or 30 years after they
were insulated. The wood siding of these houses can be evaluated for types of paint
failure and compared to comparable historic houses that have not had their sidewalls
insulated. A methodology for defining common paint failure types, their presence and
possibly their severity was designed. A methodology for the selecting of historic houses with both insulated and uninsulated walls was also designed. A visual documentation process was carried out, results compiled and analyzed in order to determine if a difference could be observed between the types of paint failures on the insulated versus the uninsulated historic houses.
In addition this study looked at the most common sources for moisture intrusion into a
wall cavity, how this moisture moves, and how little the role of vapor diffusion plays in the wetting of the wall cavity. / Moisture and paint failure -- Understanding moisture movement in buildings -- How frame walls get wet -- How insulation might affect how frame walls get wet and how they dry -- Strategies for controlling moisture -- Other causes of exterior paint failure unrelated to moisture within the wall -- Field work -- Types of paint failure -- Case study houses -- Summary and conclusion. / Department of Architecture
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:123456789/197012 |
| Date | 15 December 2012 |
| Creators | Zmyslo, Ronald J. |
| Contributors | Hill, William W. |
| Source Sets | Ball State University |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.1999 seconds