Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife (KZN Wildlife) needed to develop a solid waste
management policy and strategy for their protected areas, as well as specific solid
waste management plans for existing and new developments within these areas.
These had to be in keeping with the principles of sustainable development, protected
area conservation objectives, best practice and legislative requirements.
A pilot study was thus undertaken at two large KwaZulu-Natal protected area visitor
facilities, Hilltop Rest Camp in Hluhluwe Game Reserve and Sodwana Bay Rest
Camp, to investigate the types and amounts of solid waste generated . In addition,
the solid waste disposal methods employed in 1984 and 2000, the disposal options
available and the constraints and impacts of solid waste disposal throughout the
protected area system were investigated. A comparison was made with solid waste
production and management at Skukuza Rest Camp in the Kruger National Park as
well as with various international waste sources. The information was presented in
the form of histograms for comparison and tree cluster analysis was used as a
heuristic tool to discuss the results.
Hilltop and Sodwana Bay Rest Camps produced similar waste although its
composition varied according to the specific source of production within the visitor
facility . The waste produced at KZN Wildlife protected area visitor facilities had a
similar composition to that produced at Skukuza Rest Camp. Audits of waste
management practices at Hilltop, Sodwana Bay and Skukuza indicated that KZN
Wildlife was not adequately managing the solid waste at their two protected area
visitorfacilities. However, solid waste was being responsibly disposed of at Skukuza
Rest Camp.
The type of waste produced at protected area visitor facilities in a number of other
African countries and Australia, was similar in composition to that produced in South
African protected areas; all were similar to that produced in developed, westernised
countries. A survey in 1984 of waste disposal methods in 32 KZN Wildlife protected areas,
indicated that disposal to municipal landfill was only practised by protected areas
less than 5 000 ha in size and less than 30 km from a municipallandfill. The current
(2000) survey showed that disposal directly to landfill without reduction within
protected areas had been discontinued, and that there was an increased proportion
of waste disposal to municipal landfill. Such disposal was primarily limited to areas
of less than 10000 ha and less than 40 km from such a landfill. The main constraints
on the choice of waste disposal method were the cost of transport and limited
budgets.
A draft solid waste management policy and strategy were developed. The policy set
out the legal requirements , ecological objectives and constraints of solid waste
disposal in protected areas and also the preferred disposal options. The strategy set
out the waste disposal methods available and their associated risks, likely impacts,
opportunities and implications for management. The use of a simple matrix, that
combined transport costs (represented by distance to a municipal landfill site); the
size of the protected area (assumed to reflect the amount of solid waste generated);
and the environmental risk of leachate production (as indicated by the climatic water
balance), with suitable waste disposal options, was recommended. This matrix was
designed to assist in the objective implementation of the draft waste management
policy and in selection of an appropriate waste disposal method for each protected
area. The draft policy and strategy were applied to produce a solid waste
management plan for a new development in Umfolozi Game Reserve. / Thesis (M.Sc.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2001.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/4907 |
| Date | January 2002 |
| Creators | Hatton, Irene. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds