Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:07:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
FabioSCPpdf.pdf: 1533458 bytes, checksum: 0df903e6bea6c66d762b8b1bbe3c6937 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-11-30 / Due to the occurrence of diseases in the use of structural reinforcements in composites, with presentation of concrete blanket detachment, has been identified the need to evaluate the performance of concrete reinforced with glass fiber. This study aims to evaluate these concretes by means of testing methodologies, using concrete with low resistance with structural reinforcement for confinement by preimpregnated glass fiber and traditional fiberglass blanket. The first stage of work was the development of methodologies for analysis, opting for four types, such as the acoustic survey, strength to compressive, the pull-off and ultrasound. Next, tests were carried out using the four selected methodologies in 30 of proof-of-specimens by 5x10 cm, 15 were reinforced with the traditional fiberglass blanket with 5specimens exposed to test a marine environment of marine coastline of Natal-RN and 15 were reinforced with a pre-impregnated glass fiber blanket, as well as 5specimens exposed to a test environment of the marine coastline of Natal-RN. After conducting the acoustic survey, it has been verified a lack of delaminating and air bubbles in the samples, confirming the absence of gross shortcomings in the implementation of the ribs both the traditional fiberglass blanket and in the preimpregnated fiber glass blanket. After carrying out methods of pull-off and compressive strengthening test it was observed that the reinforced proof-bodies with pre-impregnated glass blanket showed maximum stresses higher than the traditional fiberglass blanket; consequently a greater grip with the formation of a smaller area of . fracture, unlike traditional glass mat, which showed lower maximum stresses, with a greater area of fracture. It was also found that the traditional fiberglass blanket presented detachment of blanket-concrete interface, unlike the pre-impregnated fiberglass blanket, which showed a better grip on the blanket-concrete interface. In the trial of ultrasound there was no presence of cracks in the blanket-concrete interface, yielding to both blankets good compactness of the concrete. At the end of this work, they were developed and proposed two methods of testing for evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with composites, for standardization, the acoustic survey and pull-off / Em virtude da ocorr?ncia de patologias na utiliza??o de refor?os estruturais com comp?sitos, com apresenta??o de descolamento da manta do concreto, foi identificada a necessidade de se avaliar o desempenho dos concretos refor?ados com a fibra de vidro. Sendo o objetivo principal deste trabalho, avaliar estes concretos, atrav?s de metodologias de ensaios, utilizando concretos com resist?ncias baixas com refor?o estrutural por confinamento por fibra de vidro pr?impregnada e por manta de fibra de vidro tradicional. A primeira etapa do trabalho consistiu na elabora??o das metodologias de an?lise, optando-se por quatro tipos, a sondagem ac?stica, resist?ncia ? compress?o,o pull-off e o ultra-som. Em seguida, foram realizados os ensaios utilizando as quatro metodologias escolhidas em 30 corpos-de-prova de 5x10 cm, sendo 15 refor?ados com a manta de fibra de vidro tradicional, com 5 corpos-de-prova expostos a um ambiente marinho da orla mar?tima de Natal-RN e sendo 15 refor?ados com a manta de fibra de vidro pr?impregnada, tamb?m com 5 corpos-de-prova expostos a um ambiente marinho da orla mar?tima de Natal-RN. Ap?s a realiza??o dos ensaios de sondagem ac?stica, verificou-se a inexist?ncia de delamina??es e bolhas de ar nas amostras analisadas, comprovando a inexist?ncia de falhas grosseiras na aplica??o dos refor?os tanto na manta de fibra de vidro tradicional, como na da manta de fibra de vidro pr?impregnada. Depois de executadas as metodologias de ensaios de resist?ncia ? compress?o e pull-off, observou-se que os corpos-de-prova refor?ados com a manta de vidro pr?-impregnada apresentaram tens?es m?ximas superiores ?s obtidas com a manta de fibra de vidro tradicional, consequentemente uma ader?ncia maior, com a forma??o de uma menor ?rea de fratura, ao contr?rio da manta de vi dro tradicional, que apresentou tens?es m?ximas inferiores, com uma maior ?rea de fratura. Verificou-se ainda que a manta de fibra de vidro tradicional apresentou descolamento da interface manta/concreto, ao contr?rio da manta de fibra de vidro pr?-impregnada, que apresentou uma maior ader?ncia na interface manta/concreto. No ensaio de ultra-som n?o se observou presen?a de fissuras na interface manta/concreto, obtendo-se para ambas as mantas, boas compacidades do concreto. Ao final do trabalho foram elaboradas e propostas duas metodologias de ensaios para avalia??o das estruturas de concreto armado refor?adas com comp?sitos, para normaliza??o, a sondagem ac?stica e o pull-off
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/12747 |
| Date | 30 November 2009 |
| Creators | Pereira, F?bio S?rgio da Costa |
| Contributors | CPF:15724520800, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0022988322449627, Nascimento, Rubens Maribondo do, CPF:80732810400, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8671649752936793, Santos, Maria Luiza Lopes de Oliveira, CPF:87658968404, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7052771233872451, Bezerra, Ulisses Targino, CPF:45109419434, N?brega, Ana Cec?lia Vieira da, CPF:03226264478, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3109732203611868, Martinelli, Ant?nio Eduardo |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncia e Engenharia de Materiais, UFRN, BR, Processamento de Materiais a partir do P?; Pol?meros e Comp?sitos; Processamento de Materiais a part |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds