Submitted by Elba Lopes (elba.lopes@fecap.br) on 2016-01-27T20:23:23Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
Andrea_Galvao_Rodrigues1.pdf: 7473371 bytes, checksum: 178fd1f85ec7f498bb8b518b4571be6d (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-27T20:23:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Andrea_Galvao_Rodrigues1.pdf: 7473371 bytes, checksum: 178fd1f85ec7f498bb8b518b4571be6d (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-08-29 / The aim of this research was to identify, from the point of view of the knowledge building theory, the most important authors and institutions involved in finance research publications, from 1979 to 2012, to follow how the knowledge was built in this area. It was made a sociometric study of descriptive character, involving 223 articles from 78 journals. For this, the articles were divided in six thematic areas - Portfolio Theory, Capital Structure and Dividend Policy, CAPM, Market Efficiency, Price Options and Behavior Finance. Moreover, it was made the presentation of the cooperation social networks, splitting authors and institutions according to the thematic areas. Subsequently, it was made the analysis of the areas and institutions that most represent the publications in the searched population, as well as how the building of this knowledge occurred, based on the concepts of normal science and Thomas Kuhn paradigm. The following results were obtained, mapped and followed by the social network analysis (SNA): a) the theories that compose the Modern Finance Theory have their constitution anomalous concerning the paradigms; b) in the normal course of science, response to crisis was through new finance and its behavior model; c) the results presented between the dichotomy full and limited rationality in finance fit in the concept of normal science, according to its building course; d) Finance is a research area that has already presented its scientific paradigm; e) the comparison between the periods of published research and the knowledge building, in various moments, occurs through pre-paradigmatic periods, and its first divergence point was defined based on the real behavior factor. The answer was the insurgence and the insertion of behavior models in agents' decisions, which appeared in publications only in the last two decades, even under questionings of the dominant paradigm. / Nesta pesquisa, o objetivo foi identificar, sob a perspectiva da teoria de constru????o do conhecimento, os autores e as institui????es de destaque envolvidos na ??rea de publica????o da pesquisa em finan??as, entre 1979 e 2012, para acompanhar como ocorreu a constru????o do conhecimento nessa ??rea. Foi feito um estudo sociom??trico de car??ter descritivo, com 223 artigos, oriundos de 78 peri??dicos. Para tanto, os artigos foram divididos em seis ??reas tem??ticas - Teoria do Portfolio, Estrutura de Capital e Pol??tica de Dividendos, CAPM, Efici??ncia de Mercado, Precifica????o de Op????es e Finan??as Comportamentais - e foi feita a apresenta????o das redes sociais de coopera????o, dividindo autores e institui????es em conformidade com as ??reas tem??ticas. Posteriormente, procedeu-se ?? analise das ??reas e institui????es que mais representaram publica????es na popula????o pesquisada, e como ocorreu a constru????o desse conhecimento, a partir dos conceitos de ci??ncia normal e do paradigma de Thomas Kuhn. Foram obtidos os seguintes resultados, mapeados e acompanhados pela an??lise de rede social (ARS): a) as teorias componentes da MTF t??m sua constitui????o an??mala com rela????o aos paradigmas; b) na rota normal da ci??ncia, a resposta ?? crise foi por meio das novas finan??as e de seu modelo comportamental; c) os resultados entre a dicotomia da racionalidade plena e a limitada nas finan??as apresentaram-se e se encaixam no conceito de ci??ncia normal, de acordo com sua rota de constru????o; d) Finan??as foi uma ??rea de pesquisa a qual j?? apresentou seu paradigma cient??fico; e) a compara????o entre os per??odos da pesquisa publicada e a constru????o do conhecimento passa em diversos momentos por per??odos pr??-paradigm??ticos, e tem seu primeiro ponto de diverg??ncia definido com o fator comportamental comprovado; a resposta foi o surgimento e a inser????o dos modelos comportamentais nas decis??es dos agentes, que surgiu nas publica????es somente nas ??ltimas duas d??cadas, mesmo sob questionamentos do paradigma dominante.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:132.0.0.61:tede/680 |
| Date | 29 August 2014 |
| Creators | Rodrigues, Andrea Galv??o |
| Contributors | Peleias, Ivam Ricardo, Lucchesi, Eduardo Pozzi, Walter, Silvana Anita, Lucchesi, Eduardo Pozzi |
| Publisher | FECAP, Mestrado em Administra????o de empresa, FECAP, Brasil, Funda????o escola de Com??rcio ??lvares Penteado |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do FECAP, instname:Fundação Aramando Álvares Penteado, instacron:FAAP |
| Rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/, info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0063 seconds