My thesis is directed to the definition, description and comparison of models of the financial market's regulation and supervision. The attention is addressed in particular to institutional aspects of individual systems, advantages and risks which are connected with them, and also to reasons which trigger changes in single countries. The internacional standards are basis for their legal anchorage in which parameters of the independence and accountibility play an immense role. The quality setting of the institutional structure is one, however not sufficient, presumption for the effective supervision's performance. It should not be an objective but only a stepping stone to achieve a better effeciency. The decision which model will be applied for the regulation and supervision is left upon national jurisdictions as it is actually them to take into account all the benefits and expenses including the economic size, structure and level of the market development, legal environment and the central bank's role. Within the last 20 years a fully integrated supervision was generally accepted in the frame of single institution for all financial market's sectors, mostly outside the central bank. Nevertheless, the contemporary regulation is scrutinized in the light of global financial crisis originated in the year 2008. On the base of actual findings it can be expressed that the current mechanism of regulation is not efficient and does not correspond with the degree of global interconnection among financial markets and the offer of inovative financial products. Although the European Union prepared amendments which came into effect from January 1st 2011, by which new bodies were established, the time for a detailed analysis of the potentional contributions has not come yet. However, I suppose the framework for regulation will again be reevaluated in the future. In my opinion no solution brings a complete eliminaton of risks concerning vulnerabilities and systematic shocks on the financial markets. The main analytic part of my thesis is focused on the current supervisory system in the Czech republic and Slovakia, which is based on fully integrated architecture within the central bank. Having used the methods of enquiry and intentional selection I verified the validity of two hypotheses: 1. National supervisory institutions grow in favour of market participants unlike the new set european bodies. 2. The current institutional form of the financial market supervision has a support of market participants in the Czech republic and Slovakia. The results imply that the first hypothesis is valid for the Czech republic only where generally exists a bigger discretion in relation to the new european regulation and supervision bodies. In the case of the second hypothesis it can be said that it was confirmed in terms of the institutional form of the financial market supervision has a major support of financial institutions and experts in both the Czech republic and Slovakia.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:71674 |
| Date | January 2008 |
| Creators | Jakub, František |
| Contributors | Musílek, Petr, Tomšík, Vladimír, Jirák, Pavel |
| Publisher | Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds