A monolithic approach to aero-structural analysis and optimization has been developed and implemented. In contrast to a partitioned approach which uses individual fluid and structural solvers to solve their respective systems separately, the monolithic approach solves a fully-coupled system simultaneously, enforcing solution compatibility across the sub-system interfaces at each iteration. In this work, a three-field formulation is used, consisting of fluid, structural, and fluid mesh-movement sub-systems. The performance of the monolithic approach is characterized using 1-D unsteady and 2-D steady analysis problems, and compared with a partitioned approach. Four steady model aero-structural optimization problems are also investigated. Gradients of the objective function are computed using the discrete-adjoint and flow-sensitivity (direct) methods. In each case, the monolithic approach is shown to be a promising option for efficient aero-structural analysis and optimization, though the implementation requires additional development of coupling sub-matrices when compared to a partitioned approach.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TORONTO/oai:tspace.library.utoronto.ca:1807/43217 |
| Date | 05 December 2013 |
| Creators | McCormick, Neil |
| Contributors | Zingg, David W. |
| Source Sets | University of Toronto |
| Language | en_ca |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds