The deliberate use of fly ash in the production of concrete has been used for decades, but recent trends tend to maximise its utility properties. These are different types of activations from chemical through thermal to mechanical. An alkaline agent is added to chemical activation which, by etching the glass structure of the ash grain, promotes its reactivity. Mechanical activation is mainly focused on granulometry and particle size distribution curve. In this thesis three mechanical activation methods are compared: separation the ash into fractions by grain size, mixing these fractions to achieve the ideal particle size distribution curve and grinding. Four types of ash were collected from the Tušimice power plant – ash from individual electrostatic separators (I, II and III) and SESYP ash which represents the total volume of production. Ash from individual separators differ not only in the particle size but also in the chemical composition and reactivity. Better properties generally have smaller ash particles. This is used by mechanical activation by sorting. When mixing the individual ash fractions, the aim is to achieve an optimal grading curve of either the ash itself or the fine particle set in the concrete. In this work, ash is only used to calculate the mixing ratio and the grading curve according to Funk was selected as optimal. The last compared option of activation was grinding ash. Grinding was carried out in an industrial mill for 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 minutes. The efficiency of the modified ash was monitored for cement paste in terms of rheology and for concrete in terms of consistency, strength and durability. Based on the results we can say that mechanical activation by sorting is suitable for special purposes, but it’s necessary to realise that coarser ash fractions remain unused. When mixing the fractions to ensure matrix density, the efficiency was shown mainly on the durability characteristics. Grinding cause positive effect.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:390274 |
Creators | Jančaříková, Denisa |
Contributors | Ďurica,, Tibor, Klečka,, Tomáš, Kulísek, Karel, Hela, Rudolf |
Publisher | Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta stavební |
Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
Language | Czech |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds