According to the Forest Care Act, an approved rejuvenation is required no later thanthree years after rejuvenation has been made. Approved rejuvenation methods arenatural rejuvenation, sowing or planting. In 1903, the first law on recapture wasintroduced and since then the law has gradually changed. From 1993 onwards,environmental and production goals are equal. Replanting has to be reported bylandowners to the Forest Board and this is done by filling in and returning a reply card.The report shows the growth in the field and compares this with the answers from theresponse cards. Hylte municipality, all response cards match the observations in thefield. In Halmstad municipality, 18 areas have been observed, of which 14 have beenreported by the landowner that a rejuvenation has been carried out.The intention of the report is also to review how the response cards look and howlandowners perceive them. What could be improved on current response cards?Landowners have been interviewed and data has been collected through fieldobservations. The results have then been compiled and describe the differences observedbetween two different municipalities. In Hylte municipality, the proportion ofrejuvenated areas is 95 percent, while in Halmstad municipality only 79 percent.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:lnu-71533 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Lisa, Skagerberg |
| Publisher | Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för skog och träteknik (SOT) |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds