This study intends to explore if ¡§right to education¡¨ is guaranteed by the Constitution in our country and, furthermore, tries to construct a new theoretical framework for clarifying the function and scope of protection of ¡§right of education¡¨. This paper reviews various theories with regard to ¡§right to education¡¨ and finds a great diversity on this issue. According to the author, such a variety occurred because two characteristics of clause of fundamental rights--statutorization and openness-- have rarely been emphasized in discussing ¡§right to education¡¨. Therefore, this paper tries to develop a new theory based upon the ¡§scope of constitutional protection¡¨. The ¡§scope of constitutional protection¡¨ should accord with the scope of people¡¦s life. This concept leads to a new theory regarding interpretation method¡X¡§system¡¨ and ¡§systematic fallacy¡¨. Based upon the new theoretical framework, this paper criticizes the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 563 as defective in interpretational logic and interpretation method.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0203105-111537 |
| Date | 03 February 2005 |
| Creators | Hsiang, Cheng-hua |
| Contributors | Li-Ming Yao, WEI-TA PAN, J. R. Shyu, |
| Publisher | NSYSU |
| Source Sets | NSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive |
| Language | Cholon |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0203105-111537 |
| Rights | withheld, Copyright information available at source archive |
Page generated in 0.0078 seconds