Return to search

Critical GIS : theorizing an emerging science

This research takes as its starting point the past decade of critiques from human geographers, and proposes
an alternate model for appraisals of technology. The first section begins with an analysis of the bases and
motivation of external assessments of GIS. A historiographical account reveals that the critical impulse
among human geographers was not static, but evolved to incorporate greater subtlety based on cooperation
with GIS scholars. Critiques from human geographers, nevertheless, had a profound impact on the
discipline, and practitioners of GIS frequently felt that their perspectives on issues including the roots of
GIS, its epistemological bases, and its ethics had been undervalued by critics. A re-analysis of critiques,
from the perspectives of GIS practitioners, investigates objections to critical accounts of the technology.
The second half of the research builds upon existing critiques and responses to them, but asks the question,
"is there a more constructive means to engage with technology, from a theoretical perspective?" Two
contemporary research questions in GIS are investigated, as a means of establishing a preliminary
methodology for critique that engages with GIS at a conceptual, as well as a technical level. Factors that
have influenced the progress of automated generalization are examined in some detail. The argument is
made that both social and digital parameters define the technology, and it is unproductive to focus on one at
the expense of the other. The second research question concerns data models and the extent to which fields
and objects are inevitable. The case is made that a web of historical and scientific justification has
prevented researchers from seeking alternatives to the atomic and plenum views of space. Finally, an
appeal is made for continued theoretical examination of the technology as part of an effort to develop
geographic information science. / Arts, Faculty of / Geography, Department of / Graduate

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/10899
Date05 1900
CreatorsSchuurman, Nadine Cato
Source SetsUniversity of British Columbia
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, Thesis/Dissertation
Format15591082 bytes, application/pdf
RightsFor non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds