The default mode network (DMN) is a highly cited neural network whose functional roles are not well understood. Until recently, event related fMRI experiments used to study the DMN could only be conducted in an open-loop format. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the potential statistical advantages of real-time fMRI studies to conduct closed-loop experiments to directly test putative DMN functions. Using both fMRI simulations and large archival datasets, we demonstrate that open-loop designs are less statistically powerful than closed-loop experiments that can trigger stimuli at controlled levels of brain activity. When simulating event scheduling on resting state data, DMN levels were normally distributed, but the event timing proved to be ineffective in capturing the highest and lowest DMN values on average across subjects. Statistical differences in DMN levels collected by the Human Connectome Project-Aging (HCP-A) during a Go/NoGo task were also reported, along with the network's distributional effects across subjects. When examining DMN levels in 136 subjects more prone to commission errors the mean DMN levels were reported to be higher during and prior to incorrect NoGo responses. Exploring DMN levels in these same individuals reacting to a Go task also revealed differing measurement patterns when compared to all 711 subjects in the study. Additionally, the distribution of total DMN levels across all participants, as well as during a Go or NoGo trial, showed a shift in the mean towards deactivation. Furthermore, the peak at this location was greater and revealed that increased sampling occurred at the mean and under sampling at the tails. Overall, the cumulative findings in this study were successful in providing statistical arguments to support propositions for more powerful closed-loop experimentation in fMRI. / Master of Science / Activity in a neural network is observed through the use of functional MRI (fMRI) by tracking higher levels of oxygenated blood to that region when active and lower quantities when inactive. Neural networks vary in their responsibilities, thus fMRI tasks are designed to trigger a response based on the functional role of the network. This can be exemplified by studying the blood flow to default mode network (DMN), a network responsible for mind wandering, during a task that requires focus. Researchers can then correlate moments of high activity, which indicates a greater degree of mind wandering, or low activity to a correct or incorrect response to the task.
Unfortunately, the timing in which a task is presented to the participant is predetermined prior to the subject entering the MRI making it difficult to capture a correct or incorrect response at the precise moment of activation or deactivation. This concept is known as open-loop and often collects data at moments of neutral activity, neither high nor low. In contrast, a closed-loop design allows a researcher to monitor the DMN's activation levels in real time and present the task at a desired time. This provides more useful data to the experimenter as all recorded responses to the task correlate with exact moments of high and low activation. This makes claims about the neural network's role statistically more powerful as there is a greater quantity of data at these moments rather than during a neutral activation state. The purpose of this thesis is to provide statistical arguments that support propositions for more powerful closed-loop experimentation in fMRI.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/115591 |
| Date | 29 June 2023 |
| Creators | Norfleet, David George |
| Contributors | Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, LaConte, Stephen M., Arena, Christopher B., Wang, Vincent M. |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds