Return to search

The ecology of the red-billed quelea Quelea Quelea (Linnaeus) and other granivorous birds at Eastern Cape feedlots

Red-billed Quelea Quelea quelea have expanded their range in the Eastern Cape and now occur throughout the year in new areas. Recent changes in agricultural practice have probably been a contributing factor as flocks are larger than previously recorded and were more often associated with artificial food sources than natural grasses. Ringing and census data indicate that quelea have reduced movements during the non-breeding season and may display strong fidelity (over successive years) to dry season quarters with reliable food supplies. Although the recapture/recovery rate for quelea in the Eastern Cape (1.0-2.5%) was higher than the national average, it was still lower than expected and there may be considerable movement between nearby feeding sites. Some quelea breed locally, but most disperse during summer and their numbers at the feedlots were generally highest in winter and spring. The breeding season of quelea is later than other ploceids in the region and post-nuptial moult overlaps with winter. Replacement of primary wing feathers is relatively slow (124 days), and this is considered an adaptation to minimise disruption of flight capabilities and insulation. Significantly more quelea in the Eastern Cape have breeding plumage suffused with pink than in other southern African populations. However, during the non-breeding season there is apparently considerable intermixing between local populations and those from further north and the existence of a local sub-species is not supported. Seeds of two grass species, Echinochloa sp. and Urochloa panicoides, and two weed species, Amaranthus sp. and Chenopodium sp., were important in the diet of both quelea and Laughing Doves Streptopelia senegalensis. Maize comprised a large proportion of the diet of these species and losses at one ostrich feedlot were estimated at over R 17 000 in two years. Dependence on artificial food sources was generally greatest in winter and spring, but economically significant damage was not confined to this period. Alpha-chloralose showed good potential for reducing numbers of problem birds at livestock feedlots. However, the dynamic nature of problem bird populations favours a non-lethal management approach. Reduction of feed loss through manipulation of the ostrich ration could provide a relatively cheap and effective alternative to lethal control if applied appropriately.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:rhodes/vital:5618
Date January 2002
CreatorsWhittington-Jones, Craig Alun
PublisherRhodes University, Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis, Doctoral, PhD
Format240 leaves, pdf
RightsWhittington-Jones, Craig Alun

Page generated in 0.0074 seconds