El presente Informe Jurídico analiza la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional recaía en el
Expediente N° 00655-2010-PHC/TC, el cual resuelve el recurso de Hábeas Corpus
interpuesto por la defensa de Alberto Químper Herrera, miembro del directorio de la
empresa estatal Perúpetro, quién habría participado en negociaciones junto a Rómulo
León, ex ministro aprista, a fin de favorecer la entrega de lotes petroleros a la empresa
noruega Discover Petrolum. Dichas negociaciones se dieron a conocer debido a
interceptaciones telefónicas que sufrieron los suscritos. A pesar que, el Tribunal
Constitucional declaró improcedente la demanda, tuvo a bien pronunciarse respecto al
manejo de dichos audios provenientes de “chuponeo” por parte de la justicia, los cuales
son considerados prueba prohibida. Asimismo, el Tribunal advierte que el uso de
interceptaciones telefónicas ilícitas por parte de los medios de comunicación puede
acarrear responsabilidad penal. En ese sentido, se buscará analizar y tomar posición frente
a lo esbozado por el Tribunal Constitucional, de cara a la normativa, jurisprudencia y
doctrina jurídica respecto a la improcedencia de un Hábeas Corpus contra una resolución
judicial, la prueba prohibida y la censura previa. / This Legal Report analyzes the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal in the Case No.
00655-2010-PHC/TC, which resolves the Habeas Corpus appeal filed by the defense of
Alberto Químper Herrera, member of the board of directors of the state company
Perúpetro, who allegedly participated in negotiations together with Rómulo León, former
minister from APRA. This in order to take advantage of the delivery of oil lots to the
Norwegian company Discover Petrolum. These negotiations became known due to
telephone interceptions suffered by the subscribers. Despite the Constitutional Court
declared the lawsuit inadmissible, it was kind enough to pronounce on the handling of
such audios coming from "tapping" by the justice system, which are considered prohibited
evidence. Likewise, the Court warns that the use of illicit telephone interceptions by the
media may entail criminal liability. In this sense, we will to analyze and take a position
on what was outlined by the Constitutional Court, in view of the regulations,
jurisprudence and legal doctrine regarding the inadmissibility of a Habeas Corpus against
a judicial decision, the prohibited evidence and the prior censorship.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PUCP/oai:tesis.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.12404/19998 |
| Date | 16 August 2021 |
| Creators | Tamara Coronel, Keshia |
| Contributors | Novoa Curich, Yvana Lucía |
| Publisher | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, PE |
| Source Sets | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Language | Spanish |
| Detected Language | Spanish |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds