Return to search

The robustness to non-normality of significance levels of the t and F tests

A statistical test is called"robust" if it is insensitive to departures from the underlying assumptions, this term was introduced by Box (4).

Theoretical study made by Gayen (13), (14) and (15) showed that"Student's" t-test and the closely related F-test of analysis of variance are insensitive to departures from normality. But the F-test on the equality of two variances is very sensitive to such departures.

Empirical studies made by Norton (19) and Boneau (3) agree with Gayen's theoretical conclusions. Norton studied the effect of non-normality on the F-test of analysis of variance,and showed that the form of the sampled population had very little effect on this test. For example, for the case of three groups of sample sizes 3, for the 5% level, the percentages exceeding the theoretical limits were 7.83 and 4.77% respectively for sampling from a leptokurtic and an extremely skewed population. Such property of robustness to non-normality on the F-test of analysis of variance is also possessed by t-test. Boneau's empirical study on the effect of non-normality on the two-sample t-test showed that for two samples of size 5, the significance level is respectively 3.1 and 5.1% for the empirical distribution of t’s from the exponential and uniform distribution compare to the nominal 5% value. The discrepancy is decreased when sample size is increased. / Master of Science

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/74602
Date January 1965
CreatorsHo, Tsau-yi
ContributorsStatistics
PublisherVirginia Polytechnic Institute
Source SetsVirginia Tech Theses and Dissertation
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis, Text
Format82 leaves, application/pdf, application/pdf
RightsIn Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
RelationOCLC# 7984229

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds