Return to search

A comparison of bleeding when using hypotensive anesthesia versus normotensive anesthesia during LeFort I osteotomies /

A prospective, randomized, blinded to the surgeon, clinical trial was used to compare the quality of the surgical field, blood loss and operative time when using either hypotensive or normotensive anesthesia during LeFort I osteotomies. / Twenty-three patients were randomized into one of the two groups. / Video imaging was used to assess operative time along with the quality of the surgical field. Intra-evaluator and inter-evaluator reliabilities were confirmed, intra-evaluator reliability being greater and scoring being more consistent. / There was a very highly statistically significant correlation (p $<$.0001) between surgeon's perception of the quality of the surgical field and blood pressure. / There was a statistically significant reduction (p $<$.01) in blood loss when using hypotensive anesthesia. / There was no statistically significant reduction (p = 0.44) in operative time when using hypotensive anesthesia.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:QMM.69732
Date January 1993
CreatorsDolman, Robert Mark
ContributorsBentley, K. C. (advisor)
PublisherMcGill University
Source SetsLibrary and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
Formatapplication/pdf
CoverageMaster of Science (Faculty of Dentistry.)
RightsAll items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
Relationalephsysno: 001351728, proquestno: AAIMM91847, Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.

Page generated in 0.0015 seconds