Return to search

Understanding genetic recoding in HIV-1 : the mechanism of -1 frameshifting

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uses a mechanism of genetic recoding known as programmed ribosomal frameshifting to translate the proteins encoded by the pol gene. The pol gene overlaps the preceding gag gene in the -1 reading frame relative to gag. It contains neither a start codon nor an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) to initiate translation of its proteins. Rather the host ribosomes are forced to pause due to tension placed on the mRNA when they encounter a specific secondary structural element in the mRNA. This tension is relieved by disruption of the contacts between the mRNA codons and tRNA anticodons at a �slippery� sequence within the ribosomal decoding centre. Re-pairing of the tRNAs occurs in the new -1 frame after movement of the mRNA backwards by one nucleotide, allowing the ribosome to translate the pol gene as a Gag-Pol polyprotein. A change in ratio of Gag to Gag-Pol proteins affects viral assembly, and most significantly dramatically reduces viral infectivity.
The prevailing model for the mechanism of -1 frameshifting has focussed on a pre-translocational event, where slippage occurs when the slippery sequence is within the ribosomal A and P sites. This model precludes a contribution from the codon immediately downstream of the slippery sequence leading into the secondary structural element. I have termed this the �intercodon�. Often at frameshifting sites it is a termination codon, whereas in HIV-1 it is a glycine codon, GGG. When the intercodon within the frameshift element was changed from the wild-type GGG to a termination codon UGA, the efficiency of frameshifting decreased 3-4-fold in an in vivo assay in cultured human cells. This result mimicked previous data in the group within bacterial cells and cultured monkey COS-7 cells. Changing the first nucleotide of the intercodon to each of the three other bases altered frameshifting to varying degrees, but not following expected patterns for base stacking effects. Such a result would support a post-translocational model for -1 frameshifting. It suggested that the intercodon might be within the ribosomal A site before frameshifting, and that the slippery sequence was therefore within the P and E sites.
This was investigated by modulating the expression of decoding factors for the intercodon - the release factor eRF1 and cognate suppressor tRNAs when it was either of the UGA or UAG termination codons, and tRNA[Gly] for the native GGG glycine codon. These were predicted to affect frameshifting only if slippage were occurring when the ribosomal elongation cycle was in the post-translocational state. Overexpression of tRNA[Gly] gave inconsistent effects on frameshifting in vivo, implying that its concentration may not be limiting within the cell. When eRF1 was overexpressed or depleted by RNAi, significant functional effects of decreased or increased stop codon readthrough respectively were documented. Expression of suppressor tRNAs increased readthrough markedly in a stop codon-specific manner. These altered levels of eRF1 expression were able to modulate the +1 frameshifting efficiency of the human antizyme gene. Overexpression of eRF1 caused significant reduction of frameshifting of the HIV-1 element with the UAG or UGA intercodon. Depletion of the protein by contrast had unexplained global effects on HIV-1 frameshifting. Suppressor tRNAs increased frameshifting efficiency at the UAG or UGA specifically in a cognate manner. These results strongly indicate that a post-translocational mechanism of frameshifting is used to translate the HIV-1 Gag-Pol protein.
A new model (�almost� post-translocational) has been proposed with -1 frameshifting occurring for 1 in 10 or 20 ribosomal passages during the end stages of translocation, because of opposing forces generated by translocation and by resistance to unwinding of the secondary structural element. With translocation still incomplete the slippery sequence is partially within the E and P sites, and the intercodon partially within the A site. The nature of the intercodon influences frameshifting efficiency because of how effectively the particular decoding factor is able to bind to the partially translocated intercodon and maintain the normal reading frame.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/202522
Date January 2008
CreatorsMathew, Suneeth Fiona, n/a
PublisherUniversity of Otago. Department of Biochemistry
Source SetsAustraliasian Digital Theses Program
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Rightshttp://policy01.otago.ac.nz/policies/FMPro?-db=policies.fm&-format=viewpolicy.html&-lay=viewpolicy&-sortfield=Title&Type=Academic&-recid=33025&-find), Copyright Suneeth Fiona Mathew

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds