D.Phil. / This enquiry represents an attempt to understand the ways in which the ecology of ideas surrounding HIV and Aids in post-apartheid South Africa functions discursively to silence people living with the dis-ease. In this regard, it seeks to understand how the range of subject positions available to people with HIV and Aids influences their opportunities for treatment and disclosure. The meanings emerging from this enquiry have implications for interventions aimed at people living with HIV and Aids, in that they challenge the liberal humanism underpinning a Western individualist paradigm which constructs people as ‘rational’ and ‘responsible’ on the basis that such constructions tend to attribute guilt or moral culpability to people living with HIV and Aids. The conversations and narratives elicited in the process of this enquiry suggest that such discourses constitute a form of disciplinary power in a Foucauldian sense, positioning people living with HIV and Aids defensively and limiting their options for ‘positive’ self-definition by foreclosing available subject positions, thereby contributing to the spread of HIV and Aids. Hence, this enquiry focuses on social constructions of morality and the impact of these on participants’ attempts to maintain key relationships that afford them a ‘positive’ sense of them-selves. Thus, it looks at experiences of connection and dis-connection and explores the ways in which efforts to retain ‘relatedness’ in order to maximise possibilities for the co-construction of a ‘moral self’ mediate opportunities for disclosure and treatment options. The enquiry aimed to assist participants in deconstructing dominant social constructions of HIV and Aids implicit in cultural and political discourse by applying a critical, poststructuralist and discourse-analytic lens in order that they might resist moral attributions based on liberal humanism and access their own voices in narrating the experience of living with HIV and Aids in keeping with their lived experience. My aim in this regard was to resurrect alternative or previously silenced accounts and to open up spaces for a multiplicity of meanings associated with HIV and Aids to emerge and be heard, toward the end of breaking the silence and creating a conversational space in which people’s meanings could simultaneously be heard and challenged through dialogue.Ultimately, this enquiry highlights the importance of attempting to understand the local and idiosyncratic nature of people’s constructions of HIV and Aids, which are often a hybrid mix of ideas and meanings circulating within social, cultural and political discourse. It also underscores the salience of considering people’s lives in context and particularly their need to maintain relationships that afford a positive sense of self. This is reflected in the tendency for participants to construct their identities in relation to significant others and for these relationships to mediate decision making in relation to HIV and Aids by availing or foreclosing certain subject positions, depending on the discourses within which they are situated.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uj/uj:8193 |
| Date | 27 February 2009 |
| Creators | Zaina, Jacqueline |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds