Return to search

Do feature importance and feature relevance differentially influence lexical semantic knowledge in individuals with aphasia?

<p> This study investigated two classifications of semantic features, feature importance and feature relevance, to verify if they differentially influence lexical semantic knowledge in individuals with aphasia. Feature <i>importance </i> is defined as "how important a feature is in defining a concept" (Hampton,1979), while feature relevance represents the "core meaning of a concept" (Sartori, Lombardi &amp; Mattiuzi, 2005). </p><p> A sorting task was used with 20 volunteer participants with aphasia to investigate the semantic processing involved in the association of semantic features with nouns. A corpus of 18 nouns was displayed in front of each participant in groups of three along with a card containing the word "UNRELATED." The participants were given a deck of 18 cards containing features corresponding to the nouns and to the unrelated category, and were verbally instructed to sort the deck of cards into each of the four designated piles. The semantic features on the cards were rated as high, mid and low importance (HI, MI, LI) and <i>high, mid</i> and <i>low</i> relevance (HR, MR, LR). </p><p> Analysis was completed using a two-way between-subjects ANOVA to determine was whether the mean scores at the three different levels (e.g., low, mid and high) of importance and relevance differed, and to analyze if there was an interaction between the two classifications. The participants were able to assign <i>high importance</i> features with nouns more accurately than they did <i>mid</i> and <i>low importance</i> features. Feature <i>relevance</i> did not differentially influence noun-feature association. These results indicated that the ability of individuals with aphasia to accurately associate features with nouns is influenced by levels of feature importance. </p><p> In conclusion, this study found that individuals with aphasia are more cognitively sensitive to <i>high</i> level versus <i>low</i> level feature importance and the effect does not extend to a<i> mid</i> level of importance. The study also demonstrated that the levels of feature <i> relevance</i> did not differentially influence the ability of individuals with aphasia to associate semantic features with their appropriate nouns. Potential clinical implications and study limitations were discussed.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PROQUEST/oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:3618930
Date13 June 2014
CreatorsScheffel, Lucia
PublisherKent State University
Source SetsProQuest.com
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typethesis

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds