When constructing a health economic decision model, it is critical to select a sensitivity analysis approach appropriate for the decision context. This point is particularly salient to Middle-Income Countries (MICs), where there is relatively heightened resource scarcity and increased opportunity-cost. MICs face acute shortages of accessible as well as highquality evidence, resulting in a frequent imputing of data from external jurisdictions. Conversely, there are also shortages in skills and research capacity, creating a strong complementary need to consider the contextual feasibility of applying more resource demanding sensitivity analysis methodologies. Given the above, it is therefore critical to establish whether and when the technical benefits of complex and resource demanding methods result in real-world value. We apply a comparative case study using a comprehensive approach to decision-modelling, implemented in the R and JAGS languages. Specifically, the case study replicates a deterministic model originally used to inform the cost-effectiveness of adding a bivalent Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine to South Africa's public health care cervical cancer screening programme. Crucially, the case study provides critical insight into the pros and cons of implementing more complex sensitivity analysis techniques within MIC climates. Our findings indicate that the benefits of more advanced sensitivity analysis methods are nuanced; are therefore contextually beneficial according to a case-by-case basis; and, moreover, choosing a sensitivity analysis method should be guided by a conceptual ‘fruitfulness' (i.e. a bang-for-buck), more than a mere desire to reduce model complexity. To aid analysts in this process, from our comparative case study we provide a framework with three core concept areas namely Decision-Maker Preferences (Decision Power, Investment, Risk Aversion), Analytical Considerations (Available resources, Indirect Evidence) and Policy Context (Knowledge of Topic, Technical Expertise). The framework intends to encourage more judicious selection of sensitivity analysis methods; help reduce the methodological variation apparent in MIC settings; and simultaneously provide decision-makers with greater methodological transparency in the selection of sensitivity analysis methods.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uct/oai:localhost:11427/36127 |
| Date | 16 March 2022 |
| Creators | Soboil, Joshua |
| Contributors | Cunnama, Lucy, Wilkinson, Tommy |
| Publisher | Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Family Medicine |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Master Thesis, Masters, MPH |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds