This thesis is concerned with auditory motion perception and the combinations of cues that contribute to human sensitivity of signals that change in spatial position. Measurement of how sensitive individuals are to the rates of change for auditory cues are difficult because of confounds between duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore (1988) proposed a psychometric tool for measuring sensitivity to rate of auditory cue change using a duration discrimination task. They reported that duration discrimination was improved when an additional cue based on rate of change (of intensity or frequency) was present. This provided a back door approach to measuring sensitivity to rate of change.
The current experiments were designed to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether performance was enhanced in a duration discrimination task when additional cues consisting of rate of intensity change (partial replication of Dooley and Moore, 1988), rate of spatial position change, or both cues were provided. Duration discrimination was not enhanced by these cues, in fact, it was worse. Experiment 2 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and motion if the rate differences were larger. As in Experiment 1, duration discrimination was not improved, and tended to worsen, when the velocity cues were present.
Experiment 3 shifted the focus to a direct velocity discrimination task to determine whether sensitivity to rates of spatial change varied with the mix of directional and distance information that specified velocity. Performance was better when both directional and distance cues were provided, compared to conditions where only one of these cues was available. Moreover, the benefit from having both types of information was significantly better when direction and distance cues were weighted to be perceptually equal for each participant.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03262010-141519 |
| Date | 10 April 2010 |
| Creators | Maloff, Erin Sara |
| Contributors | Daniel H. Ashmead, D. Wesley Grantham, Linda J. Hood, John J. Rieser |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03262010-141519/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.2733 seconds