In the past ten years, synthetic cannabinoids (SC) have emerged as drugs of abuse. Unlike D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), many SCs are associated with serious health complications and death. One way in which THC and SCs differ lies with their enhanced potency and efficacy at the CB1 receptor. No current methods exist to measure efficacy at the CB1 receptor in vivo, and the abuse-related properties of SC cannabinoids are not well explored. Here, we utilized CB1 wild type (WT), heterozygous (HET), and knockout (KO) mice. By employing CB1 ligands which differ in efficacy we have developed a method to explore the relationship between efficacy and the ability to produce cannabimimetic (catalepsy, hypothermia, and antinociception) effects when CB1 expression was reduced by half. Additionally, the intracranial self-stimulation procedure (ICSS) was utilized to investigate the effects of enhanced efficacy at CB1 upon reward processes using representative SC CP55,940. As predicted, the potency shift between WT and HET mice inversely correlated with the efficacy of the test drug for both hypothermia and antinociception, but not catalepsy. This efficacy stratification was correlated with the agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgS binding assay, demonstrating this model as an effective tool to ascertain in vivo efficacy differences at CB1. In ICSS, CP55,940 elicited only rate-decreasing effects acutely, although tolerance developed following repeated dosing, with no evidence for spontaneous or rimonabant-precipitated withdrawal. Together, these data indicate that highly efficacious cannabinoid ligands require few receptors to produce cannabimimetic effects, and that the model provides an effective means to quickly ascertain differences in efficacy.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:vcu.edu/oai:scholarscompass.vcu.edu:etd-5086 |
Date | 01 January 2015 |
Creators | Grim, Travis |
Publisher | VCU Scholars Compass |
Source Sets | Virginia Commonwealth University |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | Theses and Dissertations |
Rights | © The Author |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds