Return to search

Presidential Parley: Personal Diplomacy and the Modern Presidency

This dissertation is an examination of the American presidency and its use of personal diplomacy in the second half of the twentieth century. Through letter writing, telephone conversations, visits to the White House, and trips abroad, presidents engaged with world leaders on an increasingly large scale. For most of the nationâs history, presidents did not interact with their foreign counterparts. Not until the post-World War II period did personal diplomacy became common. Covering the presidency from Franklin Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan, the dissertation examines the forces that led occupants of the White House toward the practice. Rather than a phenomenon based on personality or personal predilection, presidents engaged in diplomacy at the highest-level for similar reasons. The project argues that four main factors pushed presidents toward the frequent use of personal diplomacy: 1) the imperatives of the international environment; 2) domestic political incentives; 3) pressure from foreign leaders for presidential time; 4) and presidential desire for control. Additionally, the dissertation explores the role presidents most frequently played when engaged in personal diplomacy. Often the primary focus of personal diplomacy was not necessarily political, but rather psychological. In this way, the American leader became a counselor for other world leaders. Presidents, particularly in the midst of the Cold War, felt the need to reassure and calm the fears of their counterparts. Other leaders did not necessarily see presidents performing this function, but presidents and their aides did. A work of both history and political science, the dissertation contributes to histories of U.S. foreign relations and the American presidency, as well as political science literature on the institution. Examining the use of personal diplomacy across presidential administrations provides a clearer view of how the United States engaged with the world in the second half of the twentieth century, offering a fuller, richer understanding of Americaâs role in the world and of the exercise of presidential power.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-07212016-113731
Date22 July 2016
CreatorsChavez, Tizoc Victor Hutchinson
ContributorsDr. Paul A. Kramer, Dr. David E. Lewis, Dr. Thomas A. Schwartz, Dr. Sarah E. Igo
PublisherVANDERBILT
Source SetsVanderbilt University Theses
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07212016-113731/
Rightsrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0015 seconds