Return to search

Perceptions of Faculty and Staff of the Positive Behavior Process Utilizing Team Process and Staff Satisfaction Survey

There is a great need in education to find innovative ways to increase the amount of instructional time spent in classrooms. One way this can be accomplished is by improving the school climate through the use of Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS). Teachers can improve upon their own behaviors towards students, so that student problem behaviors do not escalate to the point of suspensions and expulsions.
The PBIS philosophy embraces the idea that while humanistic values should not replace empiricism, these values should inform empiricism. Science tells us how we can change things, but values tell us what is worth changing (Carr, 1996; Carr & Durand, 1985). PBIS represents a melding of values and technologies which are judged not only with respect to efficacy (a technological criterion), but also with respect to their ability to enhance personal dignity and opportunities for choice (a values criterion). Thus, the approach eschews the use of strategies that members of the community judge to be dehumanizing or degrading (Horner et al., 1996).
The present study examines faculty and staff perceptions of the Leadership Team and the PBIS process as it functions in their school. Faculty and staff utilized for this study were employed in primary and secondary schools in Louisiana that had implemented PBIS at least six months prior to survey completion. The PBIS Staff Satisfaction Survey and the Team Process Survey are the two surveys utilized for the purpose of this study. Participants were surveyed about their satisfaction of school-wide positive behavior support on their school campus and the team process survey was given to all school-wide leadership team members to determine how their team is functioning as a school-wide positive behavior support team.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-08302011-123352
Date30 August 2011
CreatorsHill, Kara L.
ContributorsHill, R. Carter, Fox, Janet, Johnson, Earl, Denny, R. Kenton, Machtmes, Krisanna
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-08302011-123352/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds