The focus of the research was the evaluation of two instructional methodologies for teaching terrorism preparedness at several universities in Louisiana. Participants were taught a curriculum for an audience who may work at a potential terrorist target.
The purpose of the research was to determine if processing styles based instruction improved learning. The objectives of the study were to: 1) Describe participant demographics: a) age, b) gender, c) credit hours, d) field of study; and e) preferred Strategic Information Processing Style (SIPS); 2) Determine if changes occur in knowledge of terrorism preparedness as measured by the Terrorism Awareness test; 3) Determine if there are differences in the test scores based on instructional methodology; 4) Determine if test scores differ by preferred Information Processing Style (IPS); and 5) Determine if selected variables explain a significant portion of the variability in the Terrorism Awareness Test scores.
The majority of students were female. The average age was 21 years, and the range was 17 - 52. The mean number of credit hours completed was 55.69. Students, for the most part (n = 141 or 45.8%), reported majoring in social sciences. Assessment of students Information Processing Style (IPS) revealed that two thirds (n = 210 or 68.2%) preferred the Analytical Processing Style. A Paired Samples t-test revealed that the students post-test score (M = 14.02) were higher than the pre-test score (M = 13.61). The Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that the students taught using traditional lecture style scored higher on the Terrorism Awareness Test then those taught using the learning style based method.
Regression analysis revealed that demographic variables did not explain a significant proportion of the variance. The model explains a moderate amount of the variance (25.5%). The instruction methodology variable by itself explains a low amount of variance. This study suggests that this particular curriculum which was intended to focus on one dimension of learning styles based instruction appears to result in a small amount of decreased learning as measured by the Terrorism Awareness Test.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-10142004-144705 |
| Date | 19 October 2004 |
| Creators | McCarthy, William James |
| Contributors | Donna Redmann, Michael Burnett, Betty C. Harrison, Spencer Maxcy, Joe W. Kotrlik |
| Publisher | LSU |
| Source Sets | Louisiana State University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-10142004-144705/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds