Return to search

The effect of two concurrent training programs with different inter-session recovery on musculoskeletal strength

Background: Gains in musculoskeletal strength acquired via concurrent strength and endurance training have been of lesser magnitude when compared to those acquired when performing strength training alone. This attenuation in strength may be due to a lack of recovery from the high volume of exercise characteristic of concurrent training. Purpose: The purpose of this study is a) to evaluate the relative effectiveness of two concurrent training regimens, differing only in the duration of the rest between the strength and endurance training sessions, with regard to increasing strength and b) to determine if the responses of testosterone and cortisol and the changes in FFM, RMR, and blood urea nitrogen can be identified as contributing factors in this phenomenon. Methods: Twenty-four physically active, untrained males (21 + 1.37 years) completed six weeks of training in one of three groups: a same day concurrent training (SDCT, N=8), an alternate day concurrent training (ADCT, N=10), or a strength training only group (ST, N=6). Body composition measures (body weight, percent body fat, FFM, fat mass), RMR, blood urea nitrogen, VO2max, 1RM bench press, 1RM hac-squat, daily total caloric intake, and percentage energy macronutrients were measured before and after training. Salivary testosterone, salivary cortisol, and the salivary T:C were measured pre-, mid-, and post-training. All data was analyzed using the appropriate 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Results: 1RM bench press, 1RM hac-squat, VO2max, FFM, body mass, RMR, salivary cortisol, and fat consumption significantly increased from pre- to post-training. The only significant interaction was that of blood urea nitrogen, which decreased in the SDCT group and increased in the ST group from pre- to post- training. Conclusions: The lack of any significant difference among the study groups regarding musuloskeletal strength, cardiorespiratory endurance, body composition, and RMR does not support the existance of an interference phenomenon regarding the musculoskeletal adaptations to concurrent training.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:TCU/oai:etd.tcu.edu:etd-07172007-082810
Date17 July 2007
CreatorsQuebedeaux, Luke Patrick
ContributorsDavid E Upton
PublisherTexas Christian University
Source SetsTexas Christian University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf, application/msword
Sourcehttp://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-07172007-082810/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to TCU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0139 seconds