Return to search

The Effects of Plasmid DNA and Immunostimulatory CpG Motifs on Immune Surveillance in Sheep Lymph Nodes

This Ph.D. dissertation examined the effects of bacterial DNA on immune surveillance in ovine lymph nodes (LN). The first study identified long-term changes in lymph nodes following exposure to plasmid DNA. Treated lymph nodes were heavier and had larger medullary areas. Furthermore, medullary cord thickness and medullary sinus width as well as germinal center size and number were increased in plasmid treated lymph nodes.<p>To determine whether bacterial DNA altered cell trafficking through lymph nodes, the efferent lymphatic of the prescapular LN of sheep was cannulated and cells were collected. Intradermal injection of as little as 4 ìg of plasmid DNA expressing the green fluorescent protein of jellyfish (eGFP) caused a marked increase in the cell trafficking through the prescapular lymph node. A dose-dependent facet existed for this response, as the increase in cell trafficking response persisted longer with 40 ìg or 400 ìg of plasmid-eGFP than with 4 ìg. This increased cell trafficking was independent of green fluorescent protein expression as both pCAN1-eGFP and pCAN1 induced similar responses.<p>Increased cell traffic induced by bacterial DNA was further characterized by determining whether bacterial DNA form was critical for this response. Treatment with intact plasmid (circular) DNA induced the greatest increase in cell traffic. In contrast, when plasmid DNA was digested with restriction enzymes into linear fragments of DNA, then cell trafficking was not significantly increased. <p>Numerous studies have shown that immunostimulatory guanosine-cytosine (CpG) motifs activate cells in vitro and can improve protective immune responses in vivo . Therefore we tested the hypothesis that the presence of immunostimulatory CpG motifs within plasmids was responsible for altering cell trafficking. It was shown that plasmids with added immunostimulatory CpG sequences affected cell trafficking in a dose-dependent manner. The injection of 40 ìg of pBISIA-88 caused an increase in cell trafficking while injecting 400 ìg pBISIA-88 failed to increase cell flow above control levels.<p>Analysis of cell populations collected in efferent lymph gives insight into treatment effects on immune surveillance. This is well-studied following treatment with antigen and in general, antigen induces a selective movement of cells into lymph that occurs 24 hours post-treatment. In contrast, plasmid DNA induced a rapid, non-selective movement of lymphocytes through the lymph node, suggesting that bacterial DNA and antigen may affect cell trafficking by different mechanisms and thereby have distinct effects on immune surveillance.<p>Short-term effects of bacterial DNA on lymph node architecture and cellular composition were also investigated to determine whether an increase in cell trafficking was associated with structural changes within the lymph node. While it was shown that bacterial DNA induced changes within a lymph node, including and increased number of germinal centers and an increased frequency of CD72*CD21* B cells, these changes were not correlated to increased cell trafficking.<p>In summary, bacterial DNA altered immune surveillance in sheep lymph nodes by changing cell traffic and lymph node architecture and composition. Many of these responses differed from responses observed by others following antigen treatment. The present observations suggest that bacterial DNA can function as an important signal to modulate immune surveillance and host responses to infections by pathogens.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:USASK/oai:usask.ca:etd-06222006-112910
Date09 November 2006
CreatorsUwiera, Ernest Richard Robert
ContributorsSmart, M., Jackson, M. L., Greibel, P. J., Middleton, D. D.
PublisherUniversity of Saskatchewan
Source SetsUniversity of Saskatchewan Library
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-06222006-112910/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds