The Human Resources department, through the policies and practices that it develops, stands
as a steering function for the rest of the organisation. Human Resource policies and practices,
dealing with issues that most often directly affect every employee, set out the guidelines
which govern the behaviour, thinking and action of all members of the organisation. The
extensive influence of these policies, therefore, make it an interesting subject of research to
explore the process that is conducted to develop these policies, the individuals involved and
the personal impact of practitioners from the Human Resource department who are often the
leaders of this policy development process. Through face to face interviews, coupled with
short, factual questionnaires, subjects from information-rich organisations were questioned
regarding the nature of their policy development process and the role that individual Human
Resource practitioners play in this process. It has been determined through the results of the
study that Human Resource practitioners primarily influence the development of policies,
with some input from management and very little, if any, participation by employees.
Essentially, these practitioners draw up the policies themselves and suggestions are then
given and the policies ratified by top management before being implemented in the
organisation. In most cases, no involvement of employees is permitted although in some
instances, partial participation through representatives is allowed. The theoretical basis of the
study rests primarily on systems theory which identifies how changes in one part of the
organisation system, such as Human Resource policies and practices, has an effect on every
other part of the system, in other words, every employee. This is important when considering
that only a small group of individuals, and primarily one Human Resource practitioner,
develop policies that affect an entire organisation. The competing values approach also
impacts on the study here where it must be identified that the values of one, or a group, of
individuals should not dominate an entire organisation where individuals are guided by
different values and goals. The research addresses this issue by examining the impact that the
personal values, beliefs and opinions of the Human Resource practitioner, who
predominantly has the main influence on the process, has on the policies developed. The
study reveals that when developing policies, practitioners are in fact guided by a balance
between their personal values and the values and beliefs of the organisation. This means that
they try to remain neutral in the process, not allowing either their personal values or those of the organisation to dominate the policies. This means that practitioners do not allow their
own personal values and opinions to guide the way they influence the process and develop
policies which affect the entire organisation. This study, therefore, is an exploration aimed at
the discovery of the current practices that dominate South African organisations, with the
focus on the Durban region, concerning Human Resource policy development. The study
then extends beyond the South African borders to consider the first world situation in the
United Kingdom, allowing a comparison between the first world and South African third
world policy development process. This allows an opportunity to identify where the first
world and third world differ regarding this process and whether there may be anything that
can be learnt from the United Kingdom which could be adapted to the South African
situation. The results of the study reveal, however, that although differences could be
identified, these were neither suitable nor viable to be transferred to the South African
situation. Therefore, through the use of current literature, past research and the exploratory
interviews, this study has gathered a picture of how the process of Human Resource policy
development functions in South African organisations today. Although the focus has been on
the Durban region, the results can be generalised, both between industries and nationally. / Thesis (M.A.)-University of Natal, Durban, 2001.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/5617 |
| Date | January 2001 |
| Creators | Henry, Sonja. |
| Contributors | Bobat, Shaida. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds