Return to search

Does implementing a behavioral safety process decrease injuries and their severity?

The purpose of this study was to determine if the implementation of a Behavioral
Safety process in a high tech worksite decreases injuries and their severity. The study
also sought to determine interest and participation in the corporate Behavioral Safety
process. Past injury data were collected and analyzed from corporate and site-specific
sources to compare injury rates of sites that had implemented the Behavioral Safety
processes to sites that did not implement the process. A Behavioral Safety survey was
administered to 1569 employees to determine the level of interest and perceptions of
the Behavioral Safety Observation and Feedback (BSOF) process at Corvallis. The
survey data was gathered using Websurveyor software. No discernable differences in
OSHA Recordable Case Rate (OCR) and Lost Workday Case Rate (LWCR) were noted
for sites that had implemented BSOF processes when compared to those that had not
implemented the process. Behavioral Safety sites, however, showed decreases in the
Lost Workday Rates (LWR), whereas the Non-Behavioral Safety sites showed
increases in the LWR, suggesting that more severe injuries have declined at BSOF
sites.
The results showed that there was a decrease in the number of injuries in the
Corvallis high-risk job grouping from the period of FY'98 to FY'01. Individuals in this
job class operate manufacturing equipment, maintain equipment, work in labs, or
clean room environments. Similarly, there was an increase in the number of injuries in
the medium and low-risk job groupings.
These results suggest that the respondents in higher-risk areas (e.g. operators)
were more likely to agree that there is a need to have a Behavioral Safety Process in
place and functioning. In lower-risk areas (e.g. office workers), the respondents were
less likely to agree that participation in a Behavioral Safety process is needed.
Individuals who worked in manufacturing areas demonstrated more support for the
process than did individuals in office environments. Additionally, in areas where
management support was present, more employee support was visible.
The study showed an overall low level of interest in the process among
participants, and a lower level of interest by non-participants. Most would prefer to use
a process other than BSOF to improve personal behavior. Despite the lack of interest in
BSOF by participants, the respondents only partially supported a voluntary process and
they indicated increased safety awareness at work and at home. This included
increased recognition of safe behaviors in the work area, and an improved ability to
give and receive feedback to others. / Graduation date: 2002

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ORGSU/oai:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:1957/29571
Date18 September 2001
CreatorsHarding, Kevin C.
ContributorsHarding, Anna K.
Source SetsOregon State University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis/Dissertation

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds