With the increasing popularity of social tagging systems, the potential for using social tags as a source of metadata is being explored. Social tagging systems can simplify the involvement of a large number of users and improve the metadata generation process, especially for semantic metadata. This research aims to find a method to categorize web resources using social tags as metadata. In this research, social tagging systems are a mechanism to allow non-professional catalogers to participate in metadata generation. Because social tags are not from a controlled vocabulary, there are issues that have to be addressed in finding quality terms to represent the content of a resource. This research examines ways to deal with those issues to obtain a set of tags representing the resource from the tags provided by users.
Two measurements that measure the importance of a tag are introduced. Annotation Dominance (AD) is a measurement of how much a tag term is agreed to by users. Another is Cross Resources Annotation Discrimination (CRAD), a measurement to discriminate tags in the collection. It is designed to remove tags that are used broadly or narrowly in the collection. Further, the study suggests a process to identify and to manage compound tags.
The research aims to select important annotations (meta-terms) and remove meaningless ones (noise) from the tag set. This study, therefore, suggests two main measurements for getting a subset of tags with classification potential. To evaluate the proposed approach to find classificatory metadata candidates, we rely on users relevance judgments comparing suggested tag terms and expert metadata terms. Human judges rate how relevant each term is on an n-point scale based on the relevance of each of the terms for the given resource.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-12202010-095038 |
| Date | 23 December 2010 |
| Creators | Syn, Sue Yeon |
| Contributors | Daqing He, Michael B. Spring, Peter Brusilovsky, Brian Butler, Stephen C. Hirtle |
| Publisher | University of Pittsburgh |
| Source Sets | University of Pittsburgh |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-12202010-095038/ |
| Rights | restricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0013 seconds