Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:39:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
AndressaMO_DISSERT.pdf: 496864 bytes, checksum: 8aeadc642d4848ec83bc437bd672cdfb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-08-23 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / The undergraduate courses in Psychology have been historically pointed as defective in
aspects related to the critical education and the integration between theory and practice.
Hence, the scientific education has been considered a possibility to overcome those
lacks. Therefore, this study has investigated the undergraduate education process of
Psychology students with PIBIC (Portuguese acronym for Undergraduate Scientific
Research Scholarships Institutional Program) scholarships from CNPq (Portuguese
acronym Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development).
The scholarship program has been a strategic tool for the undergraduate scientific
research. Electronic questionnaires have been sent to all the PIBIC scholarship students
of Psychology in Brazil (622; 104 have answered), containing questions about the
program developed activities, tutoring and advising, PIBIC evaluation and other ones.
The students scientific and academic production has also been investigated through
their Lattes (CNPq s Platform in which researchers have their academic r?sum?s). The
major part of the participants (70%) has stated that the first motivation to be in the
program had been their interest in the research or in the academic career. Furthermore,
60% of the scholarship students has worked as volunteers before receiving PIBIC
scholarship. Among the students who have answered the research, 65,4% has reported
they are tutored directly by their advisors, and 80% of them attends one or more than
one advising meeting every fifteen days. It has been identified that the Psychology
scholarship students do not participate in all the research activities and that the
proximity with the advisor is related to the accomplishment of tasks which contributes
with the student critical and reflexive education. Finally, less than 25% of the students
has published scientific articles or book chapters during the scholarship, what
XI
demonstrates a possible exclusion of them in that phase of the process. In general, the
scholarship students evaluate the program positively by revealing that it contributes
with their professional and academic education. For those reasons, it is observed
PIBIC s potential role for the undergraduate education in order to develop more critical
psychologists able to propose innovations and contextualized practices. However, the
results obtained in programs like the studied one denounce the disqualification of the
provided undergraduate education for the major part of the university students, who do
not have a PIBIC scholarship. As a result, it is emphasized that it there should be more
investment for improving the quality of the undergraduate education itself and not only
for programs which are available for few students / A gradua??o em Psicologia tem sido, historicamente, apontada como deficit?ria em
aspectos relacionados ? forma??o cr?tica e integra??o entre teoria e pr?tica. Nesse
sentido, a forma??o cient?fica ? indicada como uma possibilidade para suprir essas
lacunas. Dessa forma, este trabalho investigou como acontece a forma??o dos alunos de
Psicologia bolsistas do PIBIC/CNPq, iniciativa estrat?gica para a forma??o inicial em
pesquisa na gradua??o. Foram enviados question?rios eletr?nicos para todos os bolsistas
em Psicologia do Brasil (622, 104 responderam), com quest?es sobre atividades
desenvolvidas, orienta??o, avalia??o sobre o programa, entre outras. Investigou-se
tamb?m a produ??o acad?mico-cient?fica, por meio de consulta aos curr?culos Lattes
dos respondentes. A maioria dos participantes (70%) afirmou que a principal motiva??o
para entrar no programa foi o interesse na pesquisa ou na carreira acad?mica. 60% dos
bolsistas exerceram atividade como volunt?rios antes de serem contemplados com a
bolsa. Dos respondentes, 65,4% s?o de fato acompanhados diretamente pelo orientador
e 80% t?m orienta??es uma ou mais vezes a cada 15 dias. Identificou-se que os bolsistas
de Psicologia n?o participam de todas as atividades da pesquisa e que a proximidade
com o orientador est? relacionada ? realiza??o de tarefas que favorecem a forma??o
cr?tico-reflexiva do aluno. Por fim, menos de 25% dos alunos publicaram artigos ou
cap?tulos de livros, demonstrando poss?vel exclus?o do aluno dessa fase. No geral, os
bolsistas avaliam positivamente o programa, acreditando que esse contribui para sua
forma??o acad?mica e profissional. Diante disso, assinala-se o potencial do PIBIC para
a forma??o de psic?logos mais cr?ticos e capazes de propor inova??es e pr?ticas
contextualizadas. Contudo, resultados obtidos em programas como esse denunciam a
desqualifica??o da forma??o que a maior parte dos alunos, n?o bolsistas, recebem.
IX
Assim, ressalta-se que deve haver maior investimento para melhoria do ensino de
gradua??o e n?o apenas para programas que atingem poucos alunos
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/17548 |
| Date | 23 August 2013 |
| Creators | Oliveira, Andressa Maia de |
| Contributors | CPF:56744200844, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787892Z9&dataRevisao=null, Falc?o, Jorge Tarcisio da Rocha, CPF:19653930478, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9066230660650393, Menandro, Paulo Rog?rio Meira, CPF:11932490159, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787996D1, Yamamoto, Oswaldo Hajime |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Psicologia, UFRN, BR, Psicologia, Sociedade e Qualidade de Vida |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds