Injuries to the lower extremity are frequent and severe in frontal automotive collisions, often leading to pain and long-term impairment. Most injury criteria developed for the lower extremity are conducted with the foot and ankle in a neutral posture, do not take into account footwear, and assess injury risk to the entire lower extremity at the tibia. An instrumented boot, designed to address some of these challenges, was calibrated over a range of impact energies expected in frontal automotive collisions. A dynamic calibration method was developed to convert changes in voltage across a piezoresistive polymer to the applied axial force.
The instrumented boot was then used to examine the axial impact response of two commonly used Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) lower legs, under altered ankle postures. Both posture and ATD model were found to affect the load distribution on the foot, highlighting the need to establish injury limits for non-neutral postures as well as selecting the appropriate ATD model. The instrumented boot provided regional loading information that was not reflected in standard industry metrics, emphasizing the importance of increased instrumentation in this area.
A technique was developed for mounting cadaveric feet to ATD tibia shafts, in order to gather industry-relevant load data while examining the impact characteristics of the foot. Load data were collected at the plantar surface of the foot using the instrumented boot, as well as the tibia load cells in the ATD shaft, that highlighted differences in load transmission through cadaveric and ATD feet.
Understanding the impact characteristics of ATDs under non-standard ankle postures as well as examining the load transmission through cadaveric feet highlighted some shortcomings with current injury assessment techniques. The results of this work can be used to improve future collision testing practices, in order to reduce the incidence of lower extremity injuries. / Thesis / Master of Applied Science (MASc) / Foot and ankle injuries are common in automotive collisions and often lead to pain and long-term impairment. Experimental work on these types of injuries is traditionally conducted with the foot and ankle positioned in a neutral ankle posture, which does not reflect the range of ankle postures individuals may assume in a car crash.
The purpose of this work was to use biomechanical tools to assess foot/ankle injury risk. Impact testing was performed on two commonly used crash test dummy lower legs in conditions relevant to those experienced in car crashes. A technique was developed to mount cadaveric feet to crash test dummy tibias to gather injury information of the foot, while also collecting load data in the tibia shaft – relevant metrics for industry crash testing.
The results of this work outline the shortcomings of traditional injury assessment methods and may be used to improve future practices.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/25208 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | de Lange, Julia |
| Contributors | Quenneville, Cheryl, Biomedical Engineering |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds