A mixed methods study design was employed to determine what differences in knowledge of reading instruction and perceived preparedness to teach reading exist between two groups of teacher candidates enrolled in different teacher preparation programs offered at the University of Pittsburgh. Additionally, this study investigated which components of such programs - coursework, field experience, reflection, or collaboration - teacher candidates perceived as preparing them to teach reading. Data regarding teacher candidates' perceived preparedness to teach reading were collected once upon completion of their preparation program and again after obtaining full-time teaching experience in order to record changes over time.
Data collection consisted of the Knowledge Inventory, Survey of Perceptions, Follow-up Survey of Perceptions and telephone interviews. Background information regarding teacher candidates was also collected. It was hypothesized that teacher candidates from the Masters of Arts in Teaching program would obtain higher scores on the Knowledge Inventory and perceive themselves as more prepared to teach reading than those enrolled in the Professional Year program, which would be attributable to their extended amount of time spent in the field.
An analysis of the data revealed that few significant differences existed between teacher candidates from the two programs. Based on Knowledge Inventory scores, teacher candidates had a rudimentary knowledge of reading instruction. Undergraduate GPA, PRAXIS scores, age and gender were not factors in knowledge of reading instruction. There were no differences in knowledge of reading between teacher candidates from the two programs based on amount of time spent in the field or grade-level placement. Teacher candidates from both programs perceived themselves as being prepared to teach reading; however, their perceived level of preparedness was somewhat lower after gaining teaching experience than it was immediately upon completing their respective program. Teacher candidates from both programs perceived their coursework and field experience to be the most valuable components of their program. Despite this overall sense of readiness to teach reading, teacher candidates had specific areas of concern in which they would benefit from further instruction, including: spelling and writing instruction; differentiating instruction based on assessment results; and differentiating instruction to meet the needs of diverse learners.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-04032007-141651 |
| Date | 27 June 2007 |
| Creators | Helfrich, Sara Rachel |
| Contributors | Dr. Rita Bean, Dr. Linda Kucan, Dr. Charles Perfetti, Dr. Meryl Lazar, Dr. Isabel Beck |
| Publisher | University of Pittsburgh |
| Source Sets | University of Pittsburgh |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-04032007-141651/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds