Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-03-12T20:41:16Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DanutaCoelhodeOliveiraSoaresDissertacao2013.pdf: 1013025 bytes, checksum: fe6f91775ca52a06e13e31afd1f3b3b4 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-03-12T20:48:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DanutaCoelhodeOliveiraSoaresDissertacao2013.pdf: 1013025 bytes, checksum: fe6f91775ca52a06e13e31afd1f3b3b4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-12T20:48:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DanutaCoelhodeOliveiraSoaresDissertacao2013.pdf: 1013025 bytes, checksum: fe6f91775ca52a06e13e31afd1f3b3b4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-11-28 / The current study analyzes the process of regional integration of South America and
its cohesive investments in the MERCOSUL which is marked by fierce regional
assymetry which harms the evolution of economic blocks of the subcontinent, such
as CAN and UNASUL, mainly, by the failed pursuit of initial objects and the
inefficiency of the infrastructure, such as ports, highways, waterways, railways,
bridges, power plants, and so forth. The goal of this research consists of analyzing
the integration process of South America and its investments in growth and
integration in MERCOSUL, through a bibliographical survey and a qualitative
approach. Nevertheless, it can be observed that the mechanisms to further this
integation are not enough to promote a coordinated structural as well as economic
and social cohesion since the development process of integration is driven by works
from IIRSA Plan, a shortage of capital programs and by state interests to the
detriment of the collectives. It can currently be observed that the recovery of
MERCOSUL with the approach and investment in cohesion funds such as FOCEM,
notwithstanding new revitalization initiatives of the IIRSA works by UNASUL, with
BNDES being a primary financier. However, the structural funds have deficiencies
such as a lack of resources, lack of political-institutional convergence in the intrablock
commerce, with ineffective management and protectionist measures.
Aggravated by a South American intergraton process which proposes utopian goals
for the creation of a common market, without regard to the establishing of basic
structural conditions. Therefore, it is suggested that there be larger financial
investments, improvements in the political-institutional articulation, and reduction of
rivalries. These soluions will promote the correct management of resources, besides
the necessity of new studies that demonstrate the potential of the region and provide
solutions that promote equity of the Member-Nations through the reduction of
regional assymetries. / O presente estudo de pesquisa analisa o processo de integra????o regional da
Am??rica do Sul e seus investimentos para coes??o no Mercosul que ?? marcado por
acirradas assimetrias regionais que prejudicam o processo de evolu????o dos
blocos econ??micos do subcontinente, como o CAN e a Unasul, principalmente,
pela falha persecu????o dos objetivos iniciais e pela inefici??ncia da
infraestrutura, como portos, rodovias, hidrovias, ferrovias, pontes,
hidrel??tricas, etc. O objetivo desta pesquisa consiste em analisar o processo de
integra????o da America do Sul e seus investimentos para ampliar a integra????o
regional no Mercosul, atrav??s de levantamento bibliogr??fico e abordagem qualitativa.
Constata-se, portanto, que os mecanismos de aprofundamento dessa integra????o
n??o s??o suficientes no sentido de promover uma coordenada coes??o estrutural e,
consequentemente, econ??mica e social, uma vez que o processo evolutivo da
integra????o ?? impulsionado por obras do Plano IIRSA, pela escassez dos programas
de capitais e por interesses Estaduais particulares em detrimento aos coletivos.
Observa-se na atualidade a retomada do Mercosul com o enfoque e investimento
nos fundos de coes??o como o FOCEM, al??m de novas iniciativas de revitaliza????o
das obras do Plano IIRSA pela UNASUL, destacando-se o BNDES como principal
financiador do bloco. Entretanto, os fundos estruturais possuem car??ncias, como a
defici??nia de recursos, falta de converg??ncia pol??tico-institucional para o com??rcio
intrabloco, com gerenciamento ineficaz e demasiadas medidas protecionistas.
Agravadas por um processo de integra????o sulamericano, que propunha metas
ut??picas de cria????o de um mercado comum, sem atentar-se para o estabelecimento
das condi????es b??sicas estruturais. Sugere-se, portanto, maiores investimentos
financeiros e melhorias na articula????o pol??tico-institucional, dirimindo rivalidades, que
promovam o correto gerenciamento dos recursos, al??m da necessidade de
realiza????o de novas pesquisas que evidenciem o potencial da regi??o e forne??a
solu????es que promova a equidade entre os Pa??ses-Membros mediante a redu????o
das assimetrias regionais.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2366 |
| Date | 28 November 2013 |
| Creators | Soares, Danuta Coelho de Oliveira |
| Contributors | Almeida, Wilson de Jesus Beserra de |
| Publisher | Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito, UCB, Brasil, Escola de Humanidade e Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB, instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília, instacron:UCB |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds