The thesis discusses deadlines for decisions issuing in proceedings on international protection, especially within the frame of procedure for granting of international protection status. This analysis compares current legal situation with the situation before the amendment to the Asylum Act by the Act No. 314/2015 Coll., effective from December 18th, 2015, which reflects jurisprudence, literature and administrative practice in the field. It further elaborates interpretation of certain vague legal concepts which manage the international protection of vital importance, such as "reasonable period", "without undue delay", "factual and legal complexity." The study discusses -from the applicant's perspective - means of the protection against inactivity and compares their efficiency. The thesis aims to monitor and evaluate a common phenomenon of the administrative practice, the failure to meet deadlines, altogether with extension of the deadline in the application proceedings due to the exceptional circumstances, which has become the standard procedure rather than an exception. My goal is also to raise a question whether the fundamental rights of the applicants for the international protection (who are considered to be vulnerable individuals in a difficult life situation), guaranteed by the Charter and...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:356448 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Mašlej, Jiří |
| Contributors | Kryska, David, Rajchl, Jiří |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0056 seconds