The dyadic-interactional perspective of personality suggests that behavior is a
function of both stable personality traits and the dynamic interpersonal environment.
According to this theory, interpersonal behavior generally follows the principle of
complementarity where behavior tends to be complementary on a dimension of
dominance-submissiveness and supplementary on a dimension of warmth-coldness.
Implicit trait policies are thought to influence judgments of behavioral effectiveness and
be influenced by personality traits. The current study examines the dyadic-interactional
perspective using a situational judgment test (SJT) method in order to more fully
understand both the relationship between personality traits and behavior but also to
better understand the basic assumptions of the dyadic-interactional perspective.
A 24-situation SJT was developed by the author to measure appropriate and
inappropriate situations along the dimensions of dominance and warmth. Ten advanced
psychology graduate students served as expert raters. Personality scales and the SJT
were completed by 317 undergraduates for course credit. Interpersonal skills rated by
117 of the participants’ friends served as a performance criterion for Hypothesis 5. Results support a congruence effect where the fit between response and trait
warmth has a positive effect on judgments of behavioral effectiveness. Although a
quadratic implicit trait policy effect was observed, results did not support a congruence
effect for dominance. Interpersonal rigidity was shown to moderate the effect of both
dominant and warm responses but was not shown to moderate the effect of traits.
Complementarity hypotheses were not supported, likely due to range restriction of
analyzed situations. Exploratory analyses revealed effects in support of interpersonal
theory. Situations and responses influenced perceived behavioral effectiveness in
accordance with the propositions of interpersonal theory. Situational appropriateness
was identified as a moderator of the relationship between situations and responses.
Situational judgment test scores were scored in accordance with interpersonal theory.
Scores were not shown to observable interpersonal skills as hypothesized, correlating
with only one 4-item subscale. Results extend both implicit trait policies and
interpersonal theory. Implications, limitations, and future research directions are
discussed.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3051 |
| Date | 15 May 2009 |
| Creators | Benzer, Justin Kane |
| Contributors | Bergman, Mindy E. |
| Source Sets | Texas A and M University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Book, Thesis, Electronic Dissertation, text |
| Format | electronic, application/pdf, born digital |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds