This study has two purposes: first, to test the validity of the personal attribute model in explaining judicial voting behavior outside its original cultural context; second, to explain the variation in justice's voting behavior in the Canadian Supreme Court. For the most part, the result arrived in this study supports the validity of the model in cross-cultural analysis. The result of multiple regression analysis shows that four variables, region, judicial experience prior to appointment, political party of appointing Prime Minister, and tenure account for 60 percent of the variations in justice's voting behavior. This result, hence, provides an empirical finding to the development of the personal attribute model in explaining justices' voting behavior.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc504493 |
| Date | 12 1900 |
| Creators | Sittiwong, Panu |
| Contributors | Tate, C. Neal (Chester Neal), 1943-, Gray, Kenneth R. |
| Publisher | North Texas State University |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | v, 98 leaves : ill., Text |
| Coverage | Canada, 1949-1980 |
| Rights | Public, Sittiwong, Panu, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0012 seconds