<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To perform an environmental survey of clinical practice amongst surgeons and physiotherapists in making return to sport (RTS) decisions following ACL reconstruction (ACLR); to gain a better understanding of how clinicians and patients define successful return to sport; and to compare patients’ level of satisfaction with their current level of activity following ACLR.</p> <p><strong>Design: </strong>Multidisciplinary cross sectional study.</p> <p><strong>Setting</strong>: Online</p> <p><strong>Participants:</strong> Orthopaedic surgeons and registered physiotherapists; and patients who had undergone ACLR within the previous 6-18 months.</p> <p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Surgeons and physiotherapists completed separate web surveys, each consisting of 10 closed format questions that included sections on demographics, outcome measures, treatment procedures, and RTS decisions. Patients completed a web survey consisting of 19 questions about their activity level, their experience surrounding the process of rehabilitation after ACLR, and their decisions surrounding RTS.</p> <p><strong>Main Outcome Measures</strong><strong>: </strong>Descriptive and subjective data were collected for all groups. Clinician responses were compared for differences in frequencies of clinical outcome measures used to decide RTS readiness. Frequency data were collected for all groups for the definition of successful RTS following ACLR using a self-report form. The relationship between patient satisfaction and current level of activity following ACLR was compared using the Tegner Activity Scale and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> All patients were unanimous in their definition of successful RTS post ACLR as the ability to fully participate in pre-injury level of sport with no limitations or deficits (100%), and restoring functional stability (100%). Mean Tegner activity level scores of respondents decreased a mean of 3.4 (SD ± 2.5) from pre-injury to current level of activity (p < 0.011). However, no significant decrease from pre-injury level of activity to expected level of activity post surgery was seen. A statistically significant correlation was demonstrated between patients’ level of satisfaction and current level of activity (r = 0.84, p = 0.02), with higher levels of activity associated with increased levels of satisfaction. Overall, the majority of clinician respondents reported that jump tests, range of motion (ROM), Lachman clinical test of stability, pain, swelling, functional movement and giving way contributed to their RTS decisions. Unanimous consensus existed between clinicians for the ability to participate in any level of sport, with or without limitations, as the definition of successful RTS following ACLR.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Following ACLR, medically cleared patients had not met their high expectations of functional stability and ability to return to their pre-injury level of sport. The discordance between unmet expectations and current level of sporting activity was reflected in lower rates of patient satisfaction. Most clinicians reported using primarily impairment based not self-report measures to contribute to their RTS decisions. Clinicians and patients expressed subtle differences in their definition of successful RTS.</p> <p><strong>Clinical Relevance: </strong>Establishing an operational definition of success, and professional consensus on measures which include patient reported outcomes is an important next step in the development of goal oriented RTS guidelines.</p> / Master of Science Rehabilitation Science (MSc)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/13787 |
| Date | 04 1900 |
| Creators | Minnes, Jacquie J. |
| Contributors | MacDermid, Joy, Macintrye, Norma, Richardson, Julie |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | thesis |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds