Although formula scoring has been used since the early 1900s, it was not until 1975 that Frederic Lord offered the following potential psychometric justification for its use: If under formula-scoring directions an examinee omits only those items which would result in completely random guesses under number-right scoring directions, then the formula score will be a more efficient estimator of the examinee's standing on the trait measured. Whenever the number of omissions is greater than zero, the formula score will be more reliable than the number-right score.
The purpose of this study was to test the premise that examinees omit only those items for which they have no knowledge when taking a test under formula-scoring directions. Several studies had been carried out previously to test this premise, and the design used in this study was a synthesis of the previous designs.
Included in this study was an investigation of examinees' responses, under formula-scoring directions, to items that were constructed to be obscure. Also examinees responded to questions about their attitudes towards formula-scored tests and their strategies when taking formula-scored tests.
Because of the results of the test of Lord's premise, also included in this study was a further investigation of omissiveness, the tendency to omit items under formula-scoring directions. Item difficulty and item omissions were examined relative to Lord's premise. A variable, called L for convenience, was computed for each item in order to find to what extent responses to test items support Lord's premise. Finally, the possibility of misinformation producing a counter effect to inappropriate omissions relative to Lord's premise was investigated. / Ph. D.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/53555 |
Date | January 1988 |
Creators | Koball, Elizabeth H. |
Contributors | Educational Research, Cross, Lawrence H., Frary, Robert B., Hereford, Karl T., Schulman, Robert S., Wolfle, Lee M., Robertson, James I. Jr. |
Publisher | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University |
Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
Language | en_US |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Dissertation, Text |
Format | xi, 125 leaves, application/pdf, application/pdf |
Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Relation | OCLC# 18681175 |
Page generated in 0.0124 seconds