This work focuses on the meaning of dialectical method in the context of preceding parts of the dialogue Philebus (discourse about One and Many, asymmetrical ethical controversy, examining of the nature of pleasure) and in the context of some following parts (examples of application of the dialectical method, remembrance from a god connected with the agreement on three features of the good, sketch of the panta-ontology). This method has from its perspective the universal scope and its task is to solve difficulties. But its principle according to which it distinguishes One and Many and also Determinacy and Indeterminacy needs to be explained. The initial One has meaning of the genus which includes species or of the henad which includes monads. Limits of the dialectical method are marked with the ethical perspective based on the insight into nature of the good and with the ontological perpective which introduces the cause. The good and the cause can be identified with the pure One in order to make from them supplements of the dialectical method. This dialectical method can be applied only to One which is Many or to One which unifies Many (the pure One). It can't be applied to One which is without any relation to Many or to Many which is in no way One. In contrast to the dialectical method the...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:353846 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Černoch, Jan |
| Contributors | Špinka, Štěpán, Thein, Karel |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds