Return to search

Population Status and Evaluation of Landscape Change for the Lower Keys Marsh Rabbit

Wildlife biologists and land managers tasked with the recovery of the endangered Lower Keys
marsh rabbit (LKMR; Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) were in need of a current population estimate as well as
a method to estimate the LKMR population annually. Habitat loss and fragmentation from population
growth and development have threatened the existence of the LKMR. Establishing and understanding
long-term habitat availability for the LKMR is important for determining causes of historical population
declines as well as designing and implementing successful recovery plans.
I conducted a range-wide pellet survey and a mark-recapture study to estimate the LKMR
population. I evaluated the fit of 5 models and considered the variation in behavioral response model the
best model. I correlated (r2 = 0.913) this model's rabbit abundance estimates to pellet density in 11
patches and generated a range-wide population estimate of 317, a western clade population of 257, an
eastern clade population of 25, and translocated LKMR populations of 35 and 0 on Little Pine and Water
keys, respectively. This prediction equation provides managers a quick, efficient, and non-invasive
method to estimate LKMR abundance from pellet counts.
To quantify the amount of habitat loss and fragmentation that occurred over the last 50 years, I
systematically delineated and compared potential LKMR habitat using 1959 and 2006 aerial photographs.
Additionally, I investigated if other factors could have reduced the amount of suitable habitat available for
the LKMR with a comparison of habitat loss and fragmentation on a developed island and an undeveloped
island. Range-wide, I found that number of habitat patches increased by 38, total class area decreased by
49.0%, and mean patch size decreased by 44.3%. Mean shape index increased by 4.2% and mean
proximity index decreased by 13%. Both the 1959 and 2006 connectance indices were low while the 2006
set decreased 12.1%. I observed the same patterns of habitat loss and fragmentation on both the developed
and undeveloped islands as I did in the range-wide landscape analysis. I found that LKMR habitat has
declined in area and become more fragmented over the last 50 years. Habitat loss and fragmentation by
development have directly endangered the LKMR; however, sea level rise and woody encroachment also could have historically caused habitat loss and fragmentation. Although development in LKMR habitat
was halted, sea-level rise and woody encroachment could continue to alter LKMR habitat.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7269
Date2009 December 1900
CreatorsSchmidt, Jason Alan
ContributorsMcCleery, Robert A., Silvy, Nova J.
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Thesis, text
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.019 seconds