Return to search

The dilemma of the language-minority stud

If we define language fluency as more than simply a way of speaking, but also a
way of thinking, acting, and being, then we enter a conversation of language as
‘Discourse’ that was sparked by James Paul Gee. This conversation invokes discrete
designations of Discourse as home-based, school-based, dominant, and non-dominant.
These designations reveal divisions between Discourses that are believed to manifest
themselves in the identity formation of ‘language-minority students:’ those whose
home Discourse is non-dominant. The dominant Discourse that these students
encounter in school generates two documented paths: Richard Hoggart’s scholarship
boy and Herbert Kohl’s not-learner; both paths reflect the limited agency of these
students within academia. In order to counteract this delimiting of student agency, this
project proposes a progressive shift towards a post-modern conception of identity
formation; this can be accomplished by opening the Composition classroom to student authored, non-traditional, ‘hybridized’ Discourses. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2013.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fau.edu/oai:fau.digital.flvc.org:fau_13099
ContributorsRuiz, Maegan (author), Galin, Jeffrey R. (Thesis advisor), Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters (Degree grantor), Department of English
PublisherFlorida Atlantic University
Source SetsFlorida Atlantic University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation, Text
Format114 p., Online Resource
RightsAll rights reserved by the source institution, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds