Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:48:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
458294.pdf: 601713 bytes, checksum: 652a38b9b623991e90652e4515b3f8c6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-03-28 / This master degree dissertation in Criminal Sciences, concentration developed within the research line area named Sistemas Jur?dico-penais Contempor?neos (Legal and Criminal Contemporary Systems rules), at Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, basically focuses on the legitimacy of the criminal control over the conduct of agents (in this specific case, employees of financial institutions) that have the charge of collaborating with investigations relating to the Money Laundering crime. They must work through control systems which is related to the prevention of that crime within their working activity (named compliance duties). In Brazil, these duties had been imposed by Money Laundering Brazilian Federal Act (Federal Act no. 9.613/98). Thus, the search began for the contextualization of criminalization of Money Laundering, passing through the international rules that preceded the drafting of the Brazilian criminal law. This examination did not exclude the debate on the legal recognition of the need for protection of the socio-economic order. After that, we seek to determine how the Federal Act no. 9613/98 establishes the possibility of accusation of agents with compliance duties: the compliance officers. The willful omission mode has been chosen as a technique of criminal accusation. Then, this study examines the possibility of giving up the legal position of guarantor to those officers, considering the premises for the exercise of their function within a financial institution. Finally, we examine the legal implications of noncompliance, including as a reference, to the trial of Criminal Case no. 470 by the Brazilian Supreme Court. After all, we conclude that there is no legitimacy of criminal oversight thereof, especially if it is possible to use a non-criminal alternative, namely the administrative accountability. / A presente disserta??o de mestrado, vinculada ? linha de pesquisa Sistemas Jur?dico-penais Contempor?neos do Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais da Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, foca-se na discuss?o acerca da legitimidade do controle penal sobre a conduta dos agentes (no caso espec?fico, os empregados das institui??es financeiras) que possuem o encargo de colaborarem com as investiga??es relativas ao delito de Lavagem de Capitais, de trabalharem, por meio de sistemas de controle direcionados ? preven??o desse delito no ?mbito de sua atividade laborativa (deveres de compliance), deveres estes impostos pela lei brasileira de Lavagem de Capitais (Lei n? 9.613/98). Diante disso, a pesquisa iniciou-se pela contextualiza??o da criminaliza??o da Lavagem de Capitais, perpassando pela normatiza??o internacional que precedeu ? elabora??o da legisla??o penal brasileira, cujo exame n?o excluiu o debate sobre o reconhecimento do bem jur?dico supraindividual tutelado pelo delito em quest?o: a ordem socioecon?mica. Ap?s, busca-se determinar o modo como a Lei n? 9.613/98 estabelece a possibilidade de sancionamento das condutas de agentes financeiros com deveres de compliance, tendo sido escolhida modalidade omissiva impr?pria como t?cnica de imputa??o penal. Em seguida, examina-se a possibilidade de se atribuir a posi??o jur?dica de garantidor aos compliance officers, consideradas, para tanto, as premissas para o exerc?cio dessa fun??o Ao final, examinam-se as repercuss?es jur?dicas do descumprimento dos deveres impostos por meio da Lei n? 9.613/98, inclusive com refer?ncia ao julgamento da A??o Penal 470/MG pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Conclui-se pela ilegitimidade de tutela penal dos mesmos, haja vista a idoneidade da alternativa n?o penal id?nea, qual seja, a responsabiliza??o administrativa.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4956 |
Date | 28 March 2014 |
Creators | Pires, Adriane Pinto Rodrigues da Fonseca |
Contributors | Moraes, Voltaire de Lima |
Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Direito |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Relation | 3263773896050529173, 500, 600, 2194221341323903125 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds