Three historic communities with varying levels
of social, economic and historic preservation
issues are studied in the following chapters
to determine motivations for negotiating community
benefits agreements (CBAs), and to determine
motivations for the specific benefits outlined
within each community’s respective CBA. The
case study research examines the historic
preservation language within each CBA as well
as how the development itself and the other
benefits prescribed in the CBAs will positively
or negatively impact each community. The case
study communities demonstrate that CBAs can be
used as historic preservation planning and
implementation tools. By including thoughtful
and transparent community benefits language,
a community will be able to use the tools – i.e.
financing, technical assistance, advice and guidance, etc. – provided to them within the CBA
to successfully carry out the benefits promised
within the CBA. / Department of Architecture
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:123456789/194731 |
Date | 07 July 2011 |
Creators | Collier, Julie A. |
Contributors | Kelly, Eric D. |
Source Sets | Ball State University |
Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds