Vygotsky (1978, as cited in Day, Engelhardt, Maxwell and Bolig, 1997) argued
that a complete profile of intellectual competence must include both static
measures of what the child already knows and dynamic measures of the
child's ability to benefit from instruction. This study involves an analysis of this
contention and has two specific aims: Firstly, to determine whether modified cognition would result from mediation, using three instruments of Feuerstein's Learning Potential Assessment Device in a group administration format, as demonstrated by improved performance in post-mediation testing; and
secondly , to determine whether the group administration of the three
instruments from the Feuerstein's Learning Potential Assessment Device
will be able to detect differences in the degree of coqnltive modifiability of
individuals. The statio assessment paradigm is predominant within the South African education system and is used to categorise and place learners in
"appropriate" learning contexts ego special schools, special classes within
mainstream and mixed ability groupings. The growing discontent with
standardised tests rests mainly with the fact that they only access the
manifest level of performance of learners. As such,it is contended that they
do a gross injustice to those learners that are educationally-disadvantaged,
marginalised and culturally different to the norm groups of the standardised
assessments. The dynamic assessment paradigm is presented as an
alternative to static assessment because it focuses on learning potential. It
regards a learner's manifest level of performance as -a baseline and
emphasises the need to mediate within what Vygotsky (1978) calls the
learner's zone of proximal development to access his/her potential. The Learning Potential Assessment Device, consisting of a battery of dynamic
assessment instruments, was used in the study to ascertain the effects of
mediation on performance and to detect differences in the degree of coqnitive
modifiability of individuals. This was done using a pretest - mediation - post-test
procedure with a comparison of pretest and post-test performances. Through the process of random assignment, the population sample of thirty one grade eight subjects was divided into a control group and an experimental group. The pretest phase of three selected instruments (Numerical Progressions, the Organizer and the Organization of Dots) was administered to the group as a whole. The mediation phase was administered to the experimental group only and thereafter both the control group and the experimental group completed the post-test phase. An analysis of the results revealed that the difference in pretest and post-test mean scores for Numerical Progressions was statistically not significant. An analysis of the mean scotes of the experimental group for the Organizer revealed that the educationally-disadvantaged group benefitted from mediation to a larger extent than the educationally-advantaged group. The
pretest and post-test difference in mean scores for the Organization of Dots
was statistically significant. An analysis of the post-test scores of individual subjects within the experimental group revealed a significant improvement for some learners, a marginal improvement for others and reduced scores for some in comparison to their pretest scores. A number of postulations are given for the varied effectiveness of the mediation that was provided. / Thesis (M.Ed.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2000.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/3365 |
| Date | January 2000 |
| Creators | Taylor, Nigel Eric. |
| Contributors | Killian, Beverley Janet., Farman, Robin H. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds