The Possibilities of Using Analogy in Public Law Argument by analogy plays an important role in the law. It enables to complete legal system so that it presents system that is uniform and as to its values internally coherent. One of the basic knowledge of law faculty student is that statutory interpretation and application of law by analogy counts among logical methods of interpretation. However, this finding is being ever more frequently questioned in the recent literature. Rather than logical structure of an argument by analogy it is its logical nature that is being emphasized. The main aim of this thesis is to describe the structure of analogy as a general method of reasoning. So defined, analogy will be subsequently applied to the options of using analogy in public law as it is not possible to use analogy to the same extent in all fields of law. Generally speaking, the use of analogy in public law is more restricted than it is in private law and in particular fields of public law the restriction of the use of analogy are even stricter. Throughout the thesis I also attempt to support my theoretical conclusions with the relevant case law. The text is divided into four main chapters. In the introductory chapter I define analogy as a general method and further address its use in law into three...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:348627 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Zima, Marek |
| Contributors | Kühn, Zdeněk, Tryzna, Jan |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds