This diploma thesis deals with the disqualification of directors. With regard to the proclaimed inspirational source from the United Kingdom, the work is focused on comparing the British legal framework with its Czech counterpart. Certain theories and methods presented in comparative literature are used for this comparison, especially the theory of legal transplants and the functional method. The work is divided into five parts, including the introduction and the conclusion. Firstly, the theoretical starting points and the objectives of the work are presented, followed by the part devoted to the British legislation and subsequently followed by the part devoted to the Czech regulation, which also contains aforementioned comparison. Last ones are the chapters devoted to answering the research questions and conclusion. In the section on British legislation, emphasis is placed on the grounds for disqualification, especially on the disqualification for unfitness. There are described main features of the regulation, which are relevant for the Czech legislation. In the part devoted to Czech version, the emphasis is also put on the grounds for disqualification, the past development of regulation in the Czech Republic and the personal scope of the disqualification. Czech legislation is also analytically...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:365305 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Procházková, Tereza |
| Contributors | Černá, Stanislava, Zahradníčková, Marie |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds