The present study sought to investigate the relationship between psychological reactance, as a component of paradoxical intention and locus of control.The Rotter I-E Scale, which measures individuals locus of control on a scale ranging from zero to 23, was utilized to determine subjects' external or internal ranking. A research design was developed which included a pilot study and an experiment which contained pretest and posttest conditions for examining subjects' choice change, From the pilot study two pictures were selected which were not biased towards internals or externals in the experimental conditions. Choice change was measured by subject's pretest choice against subject's posttest choice of the two pictures.The study was designed to answer the following research questions:1) Would there be a significant difference in the choices made by the experimental subjects from those made by the control subjects, thereby indicating that psychological reactance had occurred with the experimental group? 2) Would the findings of psychological the experimental reactance indicated in question one above, be significant if differences were compared by quartile scores on the I-E Scale?In the experiment, 122 experimental subjects were compared against 31 control subjects for choice change between pretest and posttest conditions, The experimental subjects were placed into four groups, which represented approximate quartile divisions of the I-E Scale and a comparison of the frequency of psychological reactance in the four quartiles was made.Previous studies in this area had used a mean or a median split on the I-E Scale or had used the extremes of the scale.Two null hypotheses were tested by using the Standard Normal Test and by using Chi-Square, The .05 level of significance was established as the critical probability level for the non-acceptance of hypotheses.Findings1) Reactance was exhibited by the experimental subjects. 2) Differences in reactance were not significant when compared by quartiles.ConclusionsBrehm's (1966) theory of psychological reactance was supported. Me findings do not support the conclusions of Cherulink and Citrin (1974).On the basis of the findings, conclusions were drawn and speculations were made concerning the utilization of paradoxical psychotherapy.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:handle/180132 |
| Date | January 1982 |
| Creators | Robert, Daniel Georges |
| Contributors | Dimick, Kenneth M. |
| Source Sets | Ball State University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Format | xiv, 135 leaves ; 28 cm. |
| Source | Virtual Press |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds