香港的殖民處境特殊， 既沒有在殖民管治結束後獨立， 也沒有在殖民管治時期中止與中國的各種聯繫， 致「香港文學」主體性的意涵常在「本土文學」與「地區文學」之間徘徊， 衍生出不同的「本土性」及文學史意義。現存「香港文學」的不同主體性論述， 主要以「1950年代」為「香港文學」的起點， 各自呈現不同的「本土性」。本文關注「香港文學」在「本土性」研究中的價值，冀透過整理現存的各種「1950年代香港文學」論述，剖析「香港文學」的主體性論述與國族想像、殖民政策、文學生產的關係，思考以「本土性」建構「香港文學」的可能。 / 本文共有六章， 第一章「緒論」闡述研究動機、目的、研究方法，並回顧現存文獻的研究成果。第二章「『香港文學』的『中國新文學』」整理現存各種「1950年代香港文學」論述，歸納「香港文學」主體性論述的不同形態。第三章「殖民者的身影」探討1950年代的香港殖民政策，並以《新生晚報》為例，分析殖民者在1950年代香港文學生產中的角色。第四章「『通俗』的資本」運用「資本」的概念， 比較不同「1950年代香港文學」論述對通俗文學場域位置的不同見解，以考察通俗文學在論述中呈現的「本土」視野。第五章「通俗文學在『香港文學』」以香港作家舒巷城的作品， 在不同「1950年代香港文學」文選的編選情況為例，討論「象徵資本」與香港文學「本土性」的關係。第六章「結論」總結「1950年代香港文學」論述的研究價值，並展望香港文學主體性論述的其他研究方向。 / As one of the former colonial areas, Hong Kong has a more complex colonial experience. The demise of British colonial rule in 1997 did not gain independence for Hong Kong, and noticeably, Hong Kong remained in close contact with Mainland China throughout the colonial period. The debate of the subjectivity of "Hong Kong literature" oscillates between the framing of local literature and regional literature, and generates various understandings of locality and literary history. Despite discrepancy, "1950s" is commonly regarded as the critical period of Hong Kong literature’s emergence and various understandings of localism are hence generated. This dissertation aims at investigating localism from the perspective of "Hong Kong literature". Through analyzing different discourses of the notion of "1950s Hong Kong literature", this thesis scrutinizes the interplay of national imagination, colonial policies and cultural production, and tries to examine the possibilities of constructing "Hong Kong literature" with localism. / There are six chapters in this thesis. Chapter 1 addresses the motivation, purpose of research, methodology, as well as the literature review of the existing studies. Chapter 2 analyzes prevailing discourses on the notion of "1950s Hong Kong literature", so as to investigate different discursive formations of the subjectivity of Hong Kong literature. Chapter 3, with the examples in the Hsin Sheng Wen Pao(新生晚報), examines the colonial policies and its role in literary production regarding the notion of "1950s Hong Kong literature". Chapter 4 departs from the idea of capital, examines debates over the position of popular culture in the literary field. The dialogue is carried out through the different understandings on the notion of "1950s Hong Kong literature". Chapter 5 studies the relationship between symbolic capital and localism with the example of how a Hong Kong writer, Shu Xiangcheng(舒巷城), was perceived in the compilation "1950s Hong Kong literature". In Chapter 6, this section evaluates the importance of the discourse "1950s Hong Kong literature", and suggests other possibilities of the Hong Kong literature subjectivity in the future. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 鄒芷茵. / Thesis (Ph.D.) Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2014. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 143-164). / Abstracts also in English. / Zou Zhiyin.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:cuhk.edu.hk/oai:cuhk-dr:cuhk_1202832 |
| Date | January 2014 |
| Contributors | 鄒芷茵 (author.), 樊善標 (thesis advisor.), Chinese University of Hong Kong Graduate School. Division of Chinese Language and Literature. (degree granting institution.), Zou, Zhiyin (author.), Fan, Shanbiao (thesis advisor.) |
| Source Sets | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| Language | Chinese, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, bibliography, text |
| Format | electronic resource], electronic resource, remote, 1 online resource (vi, 164 leaves), computer, online resource |
| Coverage | China, Hong Kong |
| Rights | Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds