Return to search

Pigs Is Pigs| The Ideology of Violence

<p> <i>Pigs is Pigs: The Ideology of Violence</i> aims first to establish a theoretical framework whereby a model of Ideology can be apprehended, a model through which the phenomenon of violence can be&mdash;as it were&mdash;filtered. Relying heavily on the work of both Classical and Post-Marxist philosophers&mdash;from Engels to &#142;i&#158;ek&mdash;the text attempts to describe a model for understanding Ideology that is underlined by two critical distinctions: firstly, that Ideology should be understood to constitute one&rsquo;s more or less spontaneous relationship with a culture&rsquo;s Symbolic Order, and, secondly, that one of Ideology&rsquo;s most critical functions is to behave as an apparatus whereby the very meaning of an event or image can be suddenly fixed (if only ephemerally) amid the experience of phenomena&rsquo;s unravelling along a metonymic chain of many possible meanings. </p><p> Thereafter, the text endeavors to consider the origins of what human beings consider to constitute &ldquo;violent behaviors,&rdquo; exploring both the biological and socio-cultural roots of violent phenomena through the research of experts such as Richard Wrangham, Sara Mathew, Adrian Raine, and Steven Pinker. This exploration culminates in a defense of the importance of differentiating violence from power, concluding with an interrogation of the sophisticated ways in which these two phenomena overlap and interact&mdash;fixing violence as a phenomenon that can be understood in terms of an ideological category, an elaborate psychosocial apparatus whereby consent for the use of force is manufactured by quasi-Foucauldian &ldquo;regimes of knowledge.&rdquo; </p><p> In other words, how is it that one comes to differentiate between the &ldquo;freedom fighter&rdquo; and the &ldquo;terrorist&rdquo;? What ideological mechanisms are in action at those points where there emerge disagreements as to whether certain actions are heroic or barbaric? <i>Pigs Is Pigs </i> makes the claim that such distinctions are in large part manufactured in the workshops of our ideas.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PROQUEST/oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:10002400
Date04 February 2016
CreatorsSuire, Phillip Joel
PublisherUniversity of Louisiana at Lafayette
Source SetsProQuest.com
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typethesis

Page generated in 0.0025 seconds