Return to search

Implications of a Decrease in the Mature Size of Female Blue Crab, Callinectes sapidus

The size-at-maturity of female blue crabs is declining and the proportion of very small mature females (<100mm carapace width (CW)) is increasing North Carolina. Decreasing mature size of the female may have an effect on the mating success and mortality of size-disparate mating pairs. To test the effect of body size on mating behavior, I used controlled mating experiments comparing size-disparate mating pairs with similarly-sized mating pairs. Small males handled large females longer than any other mating pair combination; however, no increase in injury or mortality was found. Neither large nor small males transferred significantly different numbers of sperm to large and small females. Size-disparity appears to have no effect on mating success in blue crabs, suggesting that diversity of size-related genotypic traits can be preserved in the population. I also designed a mathematical model to estimate the lifetime spawning potential of different size-cohorts of female blue crabs subject to different mortality pressures. Cohorts of very small females (<100mm CW) that are not subject to fishery mortality produce 5.1 ? 58.1% more eggs over two spawning seasons than larger, harvestable females (127-159mm CW), suggesting an evolutionary advantage to maturing at smaller sizes. I also used the model to estimate the efficacy of a proposed restriction on the commercial harvest of large females (>172mm CW), intended to increase the spawning potential of large females in order to increase population-wide recruitment, as well as the number of recruits that may possess a larger-size genotype. The proposed seasonal (Sept. ? Apr.) commercial harvest of large females produced an estimated 23.2 ? 35.1% increase in egg production over two spawning seasons. However, since the large females compose less than 2% of the population, on average, the estimated increase in spawning potential for the entire population was negligible (0.46%). Additionally, the 5% tolerance of the regulation allows for the harvest of the entire population of large females, suggesting that the proposed restriction will be ineffective.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:NCSU/oai:NCSU:etd-01032006-152433
Date26 January 2006
CreatorsDavis, John Howell
ContributorsDavid B. Eggleston, Donna L. Wolcott, Thomas G. Wolcott
PublisherNCSU
Source SetsNorth Carolina State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-01032006-152433/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0013 seconds